Skip to content

Equations and Inequalities

Board Coverage

BoardPaperNotes
AQAPaper 1Simultaneous equations, inequalities
EdexcelP1Linear and quadratic simultaneous equations
OCR (A)Paper 1Set notation for solutions
CIE (9709)P1Simultaneous equations, inequalities

1. Linear Simultaneous Equations

We consider systems of two equations in two unknowns. The standard methods are substitution and Elimination.

Theorem. The system

A1x+b1y=c1A2x+b2y=c2\begin{aligned} A_1 x + b_1 y &= c_1 \\ A_2 x + b_2 y &= c_2 \end{aligned}

Has:

  • A unique solution if a1b2a2b10a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 \neq 0 (the lines are not parallel);
  • No solution if a1b2a2b1=0a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 = 0 and the equations are inconsistent (parallel distinct lines);
  • Infinitely many solutions if a1b2a2b1=0a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 = 0 and the equations are consistent (coincident lines).

Proof. By elimination. Multiply the first equation by b2b_2 and the second by b1b_1:

A1b2x+b1b2y=c1b2A2b1x+b1b2y=c2b1\begin{aligned} A_1 b_2 x + b_1 b_2 y &= c_1 b_2 \\ A_2 b_1 x + b_1 b_2 y &= c_2 b_1 \end{aligned}

Subtracting: (a1b2a2b1)x=c1b2c2b1(a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1)x = c_1 b_2 - c_2 b_1.

If a1b2a2b10a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 \neq 0We obtain a unique xx. Similarly for yy.

If a1b2a2b1=0a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 = 0Then either c1b2c2b1=0c_1 b_2 - c_2 b_1 = 0 (infinitely many solutions) or c1b2c2b10c_1 b_2 - c_2 b_1 \neq 0 (no solution). \blacksquare

Intuition. The quantity a1b2a2b1a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 is the determinant of the coefficient matrix. Geometrically, two lines in the plane either intersect (unique solution), are parallel but distinct (no solution), or coincide (infinitely many solutions).

Example Solve: 3x+2y=12(1)5x3y=1(2)\begin{aligned} 3x + 2y &= 12 \quad \mathrm{--- (1)} \\ 5x - 3y &= 1 \quad \mathrm{--- (2)} \end{aligned}

Multiply (1) by 3 and (2) by 2:

9x+6y=3610x6y=2\begin{aligned} 9x + 6y &= 36 \\ 10x - 6y &= 2 \end{aligned}

Add: 19x=3819x = 38So x=2x = 2.

Substitute into (1): 6+2y=126 + 2y = 12So y=3y = 3.

Solution: x=2x = 2, y=3y = 3.


2. Linear-Quadratic Simultaneous Equations

When one equation is linear and the other is quadratic (or of higher degree), we use substitution.

Method.

  1. From the linear equation, express one variable in terms of the other.
  2. Substitute into the quadratic equation.
  3. Solve the resulting quadratic.
  4. Back-substitute to find both variables.

The discriminant of the resulting quadratic determines the number of intersection points.

Example Solve: Y=2x1X2+y2=25\begin{aligned} Y &= 2x - 1 \\ X^2 + y^2 &= 25 \end{aligned}

Substitute y=2x1y = 2x - 1 into x2+y2=25x^2 + y^2 = 25:

X2+(2x1)2=25X2+4x24x+1=255x24x24=0\begin{aligned} X^2 + (2x - 1)^2 &= 25 \\ X^2 + 4x^2 - 4x + 1 &= 25 \\ 5x^2 - 4x - 24 &= 0 \end{aligned}

x=LB4±16+480RB◆◆LB10RB=LB4±496RB◆◆LB10RB=LB4±431RB◆◆LB10RB=LB2±231RB◆◆LB5RBx = \frac◆LB◆4 \pm \sqrt{16 + 480}◆RB◆◆LB◆10◆RB◆ = \frac◆LB◆4 \pm \sqrt{496}◆RB◆◆LB◆10◆RB◆ = \frac◆LB◆4 \pm 4\sqrt{31}◆RB◆◆LB◆10◆RB◆ = \frac◆LB◆2 \pm 2\sqrt{31}◆RB◆◆LB◆5◆RB◆

Δ=496>0\Delta = 496 > 0So the line intersects the circle at two points.

:::tip Tip Quadratic in both variables, which is harder to solve. :::


3. Algebraic Inequalities

3.1 Linear Inequalities

The rules for manipulating inequalities are the same as for equations, with one crucial exception.

Theorem (Order-Reversing Property). If a<ba < b and c<0c < 0Then ac>bcac > bc.

Proof. From a<ba < bWe have ba>0b - a > 0. Since c<0c < 0 and ba>0b - a > 0: c(ba)<0c(b - a) < 0 (product Of positive and negative). So cbca<0cb - ca < 0Giving ca>cbca > cb. \blacksquare

Corollary. Multiplying or dividing both sides of an inequality by a negative number reverses the Inequality.

:::caution Warning Multiplying/dividing by a negative number. Always check the sign of the multiplier before Proceeding. :::

3.2 Quadratic Inequalities

See Quadratics, Section 6.

3.3 Inequalities Involving Fractions

When an inequality involves fractions, multiply through by the square of the denominator (which is Always non-negative, so the inequality direction is preserved) or use a sign chart.

Example Solve $\frac{2x - 1}{x + 3} \geq 1$. 2x1x+3102x1(x+3)x+30x4x+30\begin{aligned} \frac{2x - 1}{x + 3} - 1 &\geq 0 \\ \frac{2x - 1 - (x + 3)}{x + 3} &\geq 0 \\ \frac{x - 4}{x + 3} &\geq 0 \end{aligned}

Critical values: x=4x = 4 (zero of numerator) and x=3x = -3 (zero of denominator, undefined).

Sign chart:

Intervalx4x - 4x+3x + 3Quotient
x<3x < -3--++
3<x<4-3 < x < 4-++-
x>4x > 4++++++

The quotient is 0\geq 0 when x<3x < -3 or x4x \geq 4.

Solution: x(,3)[4,)x \in (-\infty, -3) \cup [4, \infty).


4. Graphical Inequalities

4.1 Regions Defined by Inequalities

To represent ax+by+c0ax + by + c \geq 0 graphically:

  1. Draw the line ax+by+c=0ax + by + c = 0.
  2. Test a point not on the line ( the origin).
  3. If the point satisfies the inequality, shade the region containing it.
  4. If the point does not satisfy the inequality, shade the other region.
  5. Use a solid line for \geq or \leqAnd a dashed line for >> or <<.

4.2 Systems of Inequalities

When multiple inequalities define a region, the solution is the intersection of all individual Regions.

Example Shade the region defined by: X+y6X0Y0Y2x\begin{aligned} X + y &\leq 6 \\ X &\geq 0 \\ Y &\geq 0 \\ Y &\geq 2x \end{aligned}

This defines a polygon bounded by the lines x+y=6x + y = 6, x=0x = 0, y=0y = 0And y=2xy = 2x. The Vertices are (0, 0)$$(0, 6)And the intersection of x+y=6x + y = 6 with y=2xy = 2x: 3x=63x = 6 x = 2$$y = 4. So the third vertex is (2,4)(2, 4).


5. Rigorous Treatment of Inequality Manipulation

5.1 Transitive Property

If a<ba < b and b<cb < cThen a<ca < c.

Proof. ba>0b - a > 0 and cb>0c - b > 0. Adding: (cb)+(ba)=ca>0(c - b) + (b - a) = c - a > 0. So a<ca < c. \blacksquare

5.2 Addition Preserves Order

If a<ba < b and c<dc < dThen a+c<b+da + c < b + d.

Proof. ba>0b - a > 0 and dc>0d - c > 0. Adding: (ba)+(dc)=(b+d)(a+c)>0(b - a) + (d - c) = (b + d) - (a + c) > 0. So a+c<b+da + c < b + d. \blacksquare

5.3 Multiplication by Positive Preserves Order

If a<ba < b and c>0c > 0Then ac<bcac < bc.

Proof. ba>0b - a > 0 and c>0c > 0. Product: c(ba)>0c(b - a) > 0So cbca>0cb - ca > 0Giving ac<bcac < bc. \blacksquare

5.4 Reciprocals Reverse Order (for Positive Numbers)

If 0<a<b0 < a < bThen 1a>1b\frac{1}{a} > \frac{1}{b}.

Proof. Since a,b>0a, b > 0 and a<ba < b: 1a1b=baab\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{b} = \frac{b - a}{ab}. Since ba>0b - a > 0 and ab>0ab > 0The result is positive. So 1a>1b\frac{1}{a} > \frac{1}{b}. \blacksquare

Intuition. Consider a = 2$$b = 4. Then 12>14\frac{1}{2} > \frac{1}{4}. The smaller the positive Number, the larger its reciprocal — like how slicing a cake into more pieces makes each piece Smaller.


6. Polynomial Equations

6.1 The Factor Theorem

Theorem (Factor Theorem). If f(a)=0f(a) = 0Then (xa)(x - a) is a factor of f(x)f(x).

Proof. By polynomial division, for any polynomial f(x)f(x) and constant aaThere exist a quotient Polynomial Q(x)Q(x) and a constant remainder RR such that:

f(x)=(xa)Q(x)+Rf(x) = (x - a)Q(x) + R

Setting x=ax = a: f(a)=(aa)Q(a)+R=Rf(a) = (a - a)Q(a) + R = R.

If f(a)=0f(a) = 0Then R=0R = 0So f(x)=(xa)Q(x)f(x) = (x - a)Q(x). Hence (xa)(x - a) divides f(x)f(x) exactly. \blacksquare

6.2 The Remainder Theorem

Theorem (Remainder Theorem). When a polynomial f(x)f(x) is divided by (xa)(x - a)The remainder Equals f(a)f(a).

Proof. From the division identity f(x)=(xa)Q(x)+Rf(x) = (x - a)Q(x) + RSubstituting x=ax = a gives f(a)=Rf(a) = R. \blacksquare

The remainder theorem provides a quick way to evaluate f(a)f(a): perform polynomial division of f(x)f(x) By (xa)(x - a) and read off the constant remainder, avoiding full expansion.

6.3 Factorisation Using the Factor Theorem

The systematic approach:

  1. Find a root aa by testing small integer values (try factors of the constant term).
  2. Confirm (xa)(x - a) is a factor via f(a)=0f(a) = 0.
  3. Divide to obtain a quotient of lower degree.
  4. Repeat on the quotient until fully factorised.
Example Fully factorise $f(x) = x^3 - 6x^2 + 11x - 6$.

Test integer values of f(x)f(x):

f(1)=16+116=0f(1) = 1 - 6 + 11 - 6 = 0. So (x1)(x - 1) is a factor.

Divide x36x2+11x6x^3 - 6x^2 + 11x - 6 by (x1)(x - 1):

x36x2+11x6=(x1)(x25x+6)=(x1)(x2)(x3)x^3 - 6x^2 + 11x - 6 = (x - 1)(x^2 - 5x + 6) = (x - 1)(x - 2)(x - 3)

Example Fully factorise $f(x) = 2x^3 + x^2 - 5x + 2$.

By the rational root theorem, possible rational roots are factors of 2 divided by factors of 2: ±1,±2,±12\pm 1, \pm 2, \pm \frac{1}{2}.

f(1)=2+15+2=0f(1) = 2 + 1 - 5 + 2 = 0. So (x1)(x - 1) is a factor.

Divide by (x1)(x - 1):

2x3+x25x+2=(x1)(2x2+3x2)2x^3 + x^2 - 5x + 2 = (x - 1)(2x^2 + 3x - 2)

Factorise the quadratic: 2x2+3x2=(2x1)(x+2)2x^2 + 3x - 2 = (2x - 1)(x + 2).

So f(x)=(x1)(2x1)(x+2)f(x) = (x - 1)(2x - 1)(x + 2).

:::tip When searching for roots, test the factors of the constant term first. For f(x)=xn++cf(x) = x^n + \cdots + cThe possible rational roots are ±1,±2,\pm 1, \pm 2, \ldots (factors of cc). :::


7. Systems of Three Linear Equations

7.1 Gaussian Elimination

For a system of three equations in three unknowns, the elimination method extends :

  1. Use the first equation to eliminate one variable from equations 2 and 3.
  2. Use the resulting pair of equations (now in two variables) to eliminate a second variable.
  3. Back-substitute to recover all three variables.

This process is known as Gaussian elimination. It can be systematised using augmented matrices And three elementary row operations: swapping rows, multiplying a row by a non-zero constant, and Adding a multiple of one row to another.

A 3x3 system may have a unique solution, no solution, or infinitely many solutions, depending on the Determinant of the coefficient matrix (analogous to the 2x2 case in Section 1).

7.2 Cramer’s Rule for 3x3 Systems

For the system:

A1x+b1y+c1z=d1A2x+b2y+c2z=d2A3x+b3y+c3z=d3\begin{aligned} A_1 x + b_1 y + c_1 z &= d_1 \\ A_2 x + b_2 y + c_2 z &= d_2 \\ A_3 x + b_3 y + c_3 z &= d_3 \end{aligned}

Define the coefficient determinant:

D=a1b1c1a2b2c2a3b3c3D = \begin{vmatrix} a_1 & b_1 & c_1 \\ a_2 & b_2 & c_2 \\ a_3 & b_3 & c_3 \end{vmatrix}

If D0D \neq 0The unique solution is:

x=DxD,y=DyD,z=DzDx = \frac{D_x}{D}, \quad y = \frac{D_y}{D}, \quad z = \frac{D_z}{D}

Where DxD_x is formed by replacing the first column of DD with (d_1, d_2, d_3)^T$$D_y by Replacing the second column, and DzD_z by replacing the third.

7.3 3x3 Determinant Expansion

The determinant of a 3x3 matrix expands along the first row as:

a1b1c1a2b2c2a3b3c3=a1b2c2b3c3b1a2c2a3c3+c1a2b2a3b3\begin{vmatrix} a_1 & b_1 & c_1 \\ a_2 & b_2 & c_2 \\ a_3 & b_3 & c_3 \end{vmatrix} = a_1 \begin{vmatrix} b_2 & c_2 \\ b_3 & c_3 \end{vmatrix} - b_1 \begin{vmatrix} a_2 & c_2 \\ a_3 & c_3 \end{vmatrix} + c_1 \begin{vmatrix} a_2 & b_2 \\ a_3 & b_3 \end{vmatrix}

Each 2x2 minor evaluates as pqrs=psqr\begin{vmatrix} p & q \\ r & s \end{vmatrix} = ps - qr.

Worked Example Solve: X+2yz=3(1)2xy+z=1(2)X+y+2z=8(3)\begin{aligned} X + 2y - z &= 3 \quad \mathrm{--- (1)} \\ 2x - y + z &= 1 \quad \mathrm{--- (2)} \\ X + y + 2z &= 8 \quad \mathrm{--- (3)} \end{aligned}

Step 1: Eliminate xx from (2) and (3).

(2) - 2 ×\times (1): 5y+3z=5-5y + 3z = -5 --- (4)

(3) - (1): y+3z=5-y + 3z = 5 --- (5)

Step 2: Eliminate yy from (5).

(4) - 5 ×\times (5): (5y+3z)5(y+3z)=525(-5y + 3z) - 5(-y + 3z) = -5 - 25

5y+3z+5y15z=30-5y + 3z + 5y - 15z = -30

12z=30-12z = -30So z=52z = \frac{5}{2}.

Step 3: Back-substitute into (5):

y+352=5    y+152=5    y=52-y + 3 \cdot \frac{5}{2} = 5 \implies -y + \frac{15}{2} = 5 \implies y = \frac{5}{2}.

Step 4: Back-substitute into (1):

x+25252=3    x+52=3    x=12x + 2 \cdot \frac{5}{2} - \frac{5}{2} = 3 \implies x + \frac{5}{2} = 3 \implies x = \frac{1}{2}.

Solution: x=12,  y=52,  z=52x = \frac{1}{2}, \; y = \frac{5}{2}, \; z = \frac{5}{2}.


8. Modulus Inequalities

8.1 Standard Forms

  • f(x)<a|f(x)| \lt a (with a>0a \gt 0) is equivalent to a<f(x)<a-a \lt f(x) \lt a.
  • f(x)>a|f(x)| \gt a (with a>0a \gt 0) is equivalent to f(x)<af(x) \lt -a or f(x)>af(x) \gt a.
  • f(x)<g(x)|f(x)| \lt g(x) requires g(x)>0g(x) \gt 0 and is equivalent to g(x)<f(x)<g(x)-g(x) \lt f(x) \lt g(x).
  • f(x)>g(x)|f(x)| \gt g(x) is equivalent to f(x)<g(x)f(x) \lt -g(x) or f(x)>g(x)f(x) \gt g(x).

8.2 Methods

Two principal approaches:

  1. Case analysis: Split into f(x)0f(x) \geq 0 and f(x)<0f(x) \lt 0Replacing f(x)|f(x)| with f(x)f(x) or f(x)-f(x) respectively. Solve each case and take the union.
  2. Squaring: Since f(x)2=f(x)2|f(x)|^2 = f(x)^2The inequality f(x)<g(x)|f(x)| \lt g(x) becomes f(x)2<g(x)2f(x)^2 \lt g(x)^2 provided g(x)0g(x) \geq 0. This is often cleaner when both sides are non-negative.
Example Solve $|2x - 1| \lt x + 3$.

Since 2x10|2x - 1| \geq 0We require x+3>0x + 3 \gt 0I.e. x>3x \gt -3.

Case 1: 2x102x - 1 \geq 0I.e. x12x \geq \frac{1}{2}.

Then 2x1=2x1|2x - 1| = 2x - 1So 2x1<x+32x - 1 \lt x + 3Giving x<4x \lt 4.

Combined with x12x \geq \frac{1}{2}: 12x<4\frac{1}{2} \leq x \lt 4.

Case 2: 2x1<02x - 1 \lt 0I.e. x<12x \lt \frac{1}{2}.

Then 2x1=12x|2x - 1| = 1 - 2xSo 12x<x+31 - 2x \lt x + 3Giving 2<3x-2 \lt 3xI.e. x>23x \gt -\frac{2}{3}.

Combined with x<12x \lt \frac{1}{2}: 23<x<12-\frac{2}{3} \lt x \lt \frac{1}{2}.

Solution: 23<x<4-\frac{2}{3} \lt x \lt 4.

Example Solve $|x^2 - 4| \gt 5$.

Case 1: x240x^2 - 4 \geq 0I.e. x2|x| \geq 2.

Then x24>5x^2 - 4 \gt 5Giving x2>9x^2 \gt 9So x>3x \gt 3 or x<3x \lt -3.

Case 2: x24<0x^2 - 4 \lt 0I.e. 2<x<2-2 \lt x \lt 2.

Then (x24)>5-(x^2 - 4) \gt 5Giving 4x2>54 - x^2 \gt 5I.e. x2<1x^2 \lt -1.

No real solution from this case.

Solution: x<3x \lt -3 or x>3x \gt 3.

:::caution Warning Inequality f(x)<g(x)|f(x)| \lt g(x) only makes sense when g(x)>0g(x) \gt 0And squaring preserves the Direction since a<ba \lt b implies a2<b2a^2 \lt b^2 for a,b0a, b \geq 0. :::


9. Absolute Value (Modulus) Properties

9.1 Squaring Identity

Proposition. x2=x2|x|^2 = x^2 for all real xx.

Proof. If x0x \geq 0Then x=x|x| = xSo x2=x2|x|^2 = x^2.

If x<0x \lt 0Then x=x|x| = -xSo x2=(x)2=x2|x|^2 = (-x)^2 = x^2.

In both cases x2=x2|x|^2 = x^2. \blacksquare

9.2 Multiplicativity of Modulus

Theorem. ab=ab|ab| = |a||b| for all real aa and bb.

Proof. Exhaustive case analysis on the signs of aa and bb:

  • a0,  b0a \geq 0, \; b \geq 0: ab=ab=ab|ab| = ab = |a| \cdot |b|.
  • a0,  b<0a \geq 0, \; b \lt 0: ab<0ab \lt 0So ab=(ab)=a(b)=ab|ab| = -(ab) = a(-b) = |a| \cdot |b|.
  • a<0,  b0a \lt 0, \; b \geq 0: ab<0ab \lt 0So ab=(ab)=(a)b=ab|ab| = -(ab) = (-a)b = |a| \cdot |b|.
  • a<0,  b<0a \lt 0, \; b \lt 0: ab>0ab \gt 0So ab=ab=(a)(b)=ab|ab| = ab = (-a)(-b) = |a| \cdot |b|.

In all four cases, ab=ab|ab| = |a||b|. \blacksquare

9.3 Triangle Inequality

Theorem (Triangle Inequality). For all real aa and bb:

a+ba+b|a + b| \leq |a| + |b|

Proof. We split into cases based on the signs of aa and bb.

Case 1: a0,  b0a \geq 0, \; b \geq 0.

Then a+b0a + b \geq 0So a+b=a+b=a+b|a + b| = a + b = |a| + |b|. Equality holds.

Case 2: a0,  b<0a \geq 0, \; b \lt 0.

Sub-case (i): a+b0a + b \geq 0. Then a+b=a+b|a + b| = a + b. Since b<0b \lt 0 implies b<b=bb \lt -b = |b|:

a+b=a+b<a+b=a+b|a + b| = a + b \lt a + |b| = |a| + |b|

Sub-case (ii): a+b<0a + b \lt 0. Then a+b=(a+b)=ab|a + b| = -(a + b) = -a - b. Since a0a \geq 0 implies aa=a-a \leq a = |a|:

a+b=a+(b)=a+ba+b|a + b| = -a + (-b) = -a + |b| \leq |a| + |b|

Case 3: a<0,  b0a \lt 0, \; b \geq 0. Symmetric to Case 2 (swap aa and bb).

Case 4: a<0,  b<0a \lt 0, \; b \lt 0.

Then a+b<0a + b \lt 0So a+b=(a+b)=(a)+(b)=a+b|a + b| = -(a + b) = (-a) + (-b) = |a| + |b|. Equality holds.

In all cases, a+ba+b|a + b| \leq |a| + |b|. \blacksquare

Intuition. On the number line, going from the origin to a+ba + b directly covers at most as much Distance as going from the origin to aa and then from aa to a+ba + b.


10. Problem Set

Problem 1. Solve the simultaneous equations 3x+y=133x + y = 13 and x2+y2=25x^2 + y^2 = 25.

Solution From (1): $y = 13 - 3x$. Substitute into (2): X2+(133x)2=25X2+16978x+9x2=2510x278x+144=05x239x+72=0\begin{aligned} X^2 + (13 - 3x)^2 &= 25 \\ X^2 + 169 - 78x + 9x^2 &= 25 \\ 10x^2 - 78x + 144 &= 0 \\ 5x^2 - 39x + 72 &= 0 \end{aligned}

x=LB39±15211440RB◆◆LB10RB=LB39±81RB◆◆LB10RB=LB39±9RB◆◆LB10RBx = \frac◆LB◆39 \pm \sqrt{1521 - 1440}◆RB◆◆LB◆10◆RB◆ = \frac◆LB◆39 \pm \sqrt{81}◆RB◆◆LB◆10◆RB◆ = \frac◆LB◆39 \pm 9◆RB◆◆LB◆10◆RB◆

x=4810=245x = \frac{48}{10} = \frac{24}{5}: y=13725=65725=75y = 13 - \frac{72}{5} = \frac{65 - 72}{5} = -\frac{7}{5}.

x=3010=3x = \frac{30}{10} = 3: y=139=4y = 13 - 9 = 4.

Solutions: (3,4)(3, 4) and (245,75)\left(\frac{24}{5}, -\frac{7}{5}\right).

If you get this wrong, revise: [Linear-quadratic simultaneous equations](#2-linear-quadratic-simultaneous-equations)

Problem 2. Solve 3x1>2x+1\frac{3}{x - 1} > \frac{2}{x + 1}.

Solution $$\frac{3}{x - 1} - \frac{2}{x + 1} > 0$$

3(x+1)2(x1)(x1)(x+1)>0\frac{3(x + 1) - 2(x - 1)}{(x - 1)(x + 1)} > 0

3x+32x+2(x1)(x+1)>0\frac{3x + 3 - 2x + 2}{(x - 1)(x + 1)} > 0

x+5(x1)(x+1)>0\frac{x + 5}{(x - 1)(x + 1)} > 0

Critical values: x=5,1,1x = -5, -1, 1.

Sign chart:

Intervalx+5x + 5x1x - 1x+1x + 1Quotient
x<5x < -5----
5<x<1-5 < x < -1++--++
1<x<1-1 < x < 1++-++-
x>1x > 1++++++++

Solution: 5<x<1-5 < x < -1 or x>1x > 1.

If you get this wrong, revise: [Inequalities involving fractions](#33-inequalities-involving-fractions)

Problem 3. Show that the simultaneous equations x+2y=1x + 2y = 1 and 2x+4y=32x + 4y = 3 have no solution.

Solution From (1): $x = 1 - 2y$. Substitute into (2):

2(12y)+4y=3    24y+4y=3    2=32(1 - 2y) + 4y = 3 \implies 2 - 4y + 4y = 3 \implies 2 = 3

This is a contradiction, so there is no solution.

Alternatively: a1b2a2b1=1×42×2=0a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 = 1 \times 4 - 2 \times 2 = 0So the lines are parallel. Since c12c21c_1 \cdot 2 \neq c_2 \cdot 1 (232 \neq 3), they are distinct parallel lines.

If you get this wrong, revise: [Linear simultaneous equations](#1-linear-simultaneous-equations)

Problem 4. Solve the inequality x22x150x^2 - 2x - 15 \leq 0.

Solution $(x - 5)(x + 3) \leq 0$.

The parabola opens upwards. It is 0\leq 0 between and including the roots:

3x5-3 \leq x \leq 5

If you get this wrong, revise: [Quadratic inequalities](./02-quadratics.md)

Problem 5. Solve the inequality 1x1x2\frac{1}{x} \leq \frac{1}{x - 2}.

Solution $$\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x - 2} \leq 0$$

(x2)xx(x2)0\frac{(x - 2) - x}{x(x - 2)} \leq 0

2x(x2)0\frac{-2}{x(x - 2)} \leq 0

2x(x2)0\frac{2}{x(x - 2)} \geq 0

Critical values: x=0x = 0, x=2x = 2.

Sign chart for x(x2)x(x - 2):

Intervalxxx2x - 2Product
x<0x < 0--++
0<x<20 < x < 2++--
x>2x > 2++++++

So 2x(x2)0\frac{2}{x(x-2)} \geq 0 when x<0x < 0 or x>2x > 2.

Solution: x(,0)(2,)x \in (-\infty, 0) \cup (2, \infty).

If you get this wrong, revise: [Reciprocals reverse order](#54-reciprocals-reverse-order-for-positive-numbers)

Problem 6. Find the vertices of the region defined by x \geq 0$$y \geq 0$$2x + y \leq 8 And x+2y8x + 2y \leq 8.

Solution Intersection of $2x + y = 8$ and $x + 2y = 8$:

Multiply first by 2: 4x+2y=164x + 2y = 16. Subtract: 3x = 8$$x = \frac{8}{3}.

y=8283=24163=83y = 8 - 2 \cdot \frac{8}{3} = \frac{24 - 16}{3} = \frac{8}{3}.

Vertices: (0, 0)$$(4, 0)$$(0, 4)And (83,83)\left(\frac{8}{3}, \frac{8}{3}\right).

If you get this wrong, revise: [Graphical inequalities](#4-graphical-inequalities)

Problem 7. Prove that if a>b>0a > b > 0Then a2>b2a^2 > b^2.

Solution Since $a > b > 0$We have $a - b > 0$ and $a + b > 0$.

a2b2=(ab)(a+b)a^2 - b^2 = (a - b)(a + b).

Both factors are positive, so their product is positive: a2b2>0a^2 - b^2 > 0Hence a2>b2a^2 > b^2. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: [Rigorous treatment](#5-rigorous-treatment-of-inequality-manipulation)

Problem 8. Solve the inequality 2x35|2x - 3| \leq 5.

Solution $|2x - 3| \leq 5$ means $-5 \leq 2x - 3 \leq 5$.

Adding 3: 22x8-2 \leq 2x \leq 8.

Dividing by 2: 1x4-1 \leq x \leq 4.

If you get this wrong, revise: [Modulus function](./05-functions.md)

Problem 9. Given that x2+px+q=0x^2 + px + q = 0 has roots α\alpha and β\betaAnd α+β=6\alpha + \beta = 6 and αβ=8\alpha\beta = 8Find pp and qq.

Solution By Viète's formulas (sum and product of roots): $-p = 6$ and $q = 8$.

So p = -6$$q = 8.

Verification: x26x+8=(x2)(x4)=0x^2 - 6x + 8 = (x - 2)(x - 4) = 0Giving roots 22 and 44 with sum 66 and product 88. ✓

If you get this wrong, revise: [Quadratics](./02-quadratics.md)

Problem 10. Solve x45x2+4=0x^4 - 5x^2 + 4 = 0 by treating it as a quadratic in x2x^2.

Solution Let $u = x^2$. Then $u^2 - 5u + 4 = 0$.

(u1)(u4)=0(u - 1)(u - 4) = 0

u=1u = 1 or u=4u = 4.

x2=1    x=±1x^2 = 1 \implies x = \pm 1.

x2=4    x=±2x^2 = 4 \implies x = \pm 2.

Solutions: x=2,1,1,2x = -2, -1, 1, 2.

If you get this wrong, revise: [Quadratic formula](./02-quadratics.md)

Problem 11. Given that (x2)(x - 2) is a factor of f(x)=x3+ax2+bx12f(x) = x^3 + ax^2 + bx - 12And f(1)=6f(1) = -6 Find aa and bb. Hence fully factorise f(x)f(x).

Solution Since $(x - 2)$ is a factor, $f(2) = 0$ by the factor theorem:

f(2)=8+4a+2b12=4a+2b4=0    2a+b=2(i)f(2) = 8 + 4a + 2b - 12 = 4a + 2b - 4 = 0 \implies 2a + b = 2 \quad \mathrm{--- (i)}

Also f(1)=6f(1) = -6:

f(1)=1+a+b12=a+b11=6    a+b=5(ii)f(1) = 1 + a + b - 12 = a + b - 11 = -6 \implies a + b = 5 \quad \mathrm{--- (ii)}

Subtracting (i) from (ii): a=3-a = 3So a=3a = -3.

From (ii): b=5(3)=8b = 5 - (-3) = 8.

So f(x)=x33x2+8x12f(x) = x^3 - 3x^2 + 8x - 12.

Divide by (x2)(x - 2): f(x)=(x2)(x2x+6)f(x) = (x - 2)(x^2 - x + 6).

The discriminant of x2x+6x^2 - x + 6 is Δ=124=23<0\Delta = 1 - 24 = -23 \lt 0So no further real factorisation Is possible.

f(x)=(x2)(x2x+6)f(x) = (x - 2)(x^2 - x + 6)

If you get this wrong, revise: [Polynomial equations](#6-polynomial-equations)

Problem 12. Solve the system of equations:

X+y+z=62xy+z=3X+2yz=5\begin{aligned} X + y + z &= 6 \\ 2x - y + z &= 3 \\ X + 2y - z &= 5 \end{aligned}
Solution **Step 1:** Eliminate $z$.

(2) - (1): x2y=3x - 2y = -3 --- (4)

(1) ++ (3): 2x+3y=112x + 3y = 11 --- (5)

Step 2: Solve (4) and (5) simultaneously.

From (4): x=2y3x = 2y - 3. Substitute into (5):

2(2y3)+3y=11    7y6=11    y=1772(2y - 3) + 3y = 11 \implies 7y - 6 = 11 \implies y = \frac{17}{7}

x=21773=34217=137x = 2 \cdot \frac{17}{7} - 3 = \frac{34 - 21}{7} = \frac{13}{7}

Step 3: Find zz from (1):

z=6xy=6137177=42307=127z = 6 - x - y = 6 - \frac{13}{7} - \frac{17}{7} = \frac{42 - 30}{7} = \frac{12}{7}

Solution: x=137,  y=177,  z=127x = \frac{13}{7}, \; y = \frac{17}{7}, \; z = \frac{12}{7}.

If you get this wrong, revise: [Systems of three linear equations](#7-systems-of-three-linear-equations)

Problem 13. Solve x23x+12|x^2 - 3x + 1| \geq 2.

Solution **Case 1:** $x^2 - 3x + 1 \geq 0$I.e. $x \leq \frac◆LB◆3 - \sqrt{5}◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆$ or $x \geq \frac◆LB◆3 + \sqrt{5}◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆$.

Then x23x+12x^2 - 3x + 1 \geq 2Giving x23x10x^2 - 3x - 1 \geq 0.

Roots: x=LB3±13RB◆◆LB2RBx = \frac◆LB◆3 \pm \sqrt{13}◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆.

So xLB313RB◆◆LB2RBx \leq \frac◆LB◆3 - \sqrt{13}◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆ or xLB3+13RB◆◆LB2RBx \geq \frac◆LB◆3 + \sqrt{13}◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆.

Since 13>5\sqrt{13} \gt \sqrt{5}The condition x23x+10x^2 - 3x + 1 \geq 0 is automatically satisfied by These ranges.

Case 2: x23x+1<0x^2 - 3x + 1 \lt 0I.e. LB35RB◆◆LB2RB<x<LB3+5RB◆◆LB2RB\frac◆LB◆3 - \sqrt{5}◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆ \lt x \lt \frac◆LB◆3 + \sqrt{5}◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆.

Then (x23x+1)2-(x^2 - 3x + 1) \geq 2Giving x23x+30x^2 - 3x + 3 \leq 0.

Discriminant: Δ=912=3<0\Delta = 9 - 12 = -3 \lt 0. Since the parabola opens upward, x23x+3>0x^2 - 3x + 3 \gt 0 For all real xx. No solution from this case.

Solution: xLB313RB◆◆LB2RBx \leq \frac◆LB◆3 - \sqrt{13}◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆ or xLB3+13RB◆◆LB2RBx \geq \frac◆LB◆3 + \sqrt{13}◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆.

If you get this wrong, revise: [Modulus inequalities](#8-modulus-inequalities)

Problem 14. Find the area of the region defined by x \geq 0$$y \geq 0$$3x + 2y \leq 12 And x+y3x + y \geq 3.

Solution The region is bounded by four lines. Find the vertices:
  • (0,3)(0, 3): intersection of x=0x = 0 and x+y=3x + y = 3.
  • (0,6)(0, 6): intersection of x=0x = 0 and 3x+2y=123x + 2y = 12.
  • (4,0)(4, 0): intersection of y=0y = 0 and 3x+2y=123x + 2y = 12.
  • (3,0)(3, 0): intersection of y=0y = 0 and x+y=3x + y = 3.

The region is a trapezoid. Using the shoelace formula with vertices (0,3),(0,6),(4,0),(3,0)(0, 3), (0, 6), (4, 0), (3, 0) In order:

Area=12ixiyi+1iyixi+1\mathrm{Area} = \frac{1}{2}\left| \sum_{i} x_i y_{i+1} - \sum_{i} y_i x_{i+1} \right|

=12(06+00+40+33)(30+64+03+00)= \frac{1}{2}\left| (0 \cdot 6 + 0 \cdot 0 + 4 \cdot 0 + 3 \cdot 3) - (3 \cdot 0 + 6 \cdot 4 + 0 \cdot 3 + 0 \cdot 0) \right|

=12924=152= \frac{1}{2}\left| 9 - 24 \right| = \frac{15}{2}

If you get this wrong, revise: [Graphical inequalities](#4-graphical-inequalities)

Problem 15. Solve the simultaneous equations x2+xy=10x^2 + xy = 10 and y2+xy=15y^2 + xy = 15.

Solution **Key insight:** add and subtract the equations.

Adding: x2+2xy+y2=25x^2 + 2xy + y^2 = 25So (x+y)2=25(x + y)^2 = 25.

This gives x+y=5x + y = 5 or x+y=5x + y = -5.

Subtracting: y2x2=5y^2 - x^2 = 5So (yx)(y+x)=5(y - x)(y + x) = 5.

Case 1: x+y=5x + y = 5.

Then (yx)(5)=5(y - x)(5) = 5Giving yx=1y - x = 1.

From x+y=5x + y = 5 and yx=1y - x = 1: adding gives 2y=62y = 6So y=3y = 3, x=2x = 2.

Case 2: x+y=5x + y = -5.

Then (yx)(5)=5(y - x)(-5) = 5Giving yx=1y - x = -1.

From x+y=5x + y = -5 and yx=1y - x = -1: adding gives 2y=62y = -6So y=3y = -3, x=2x = -2.

Verification: (2,3)(2, 3): 4+6=104 + 6 = 10 ✓ and 9+6=159 + 6 = 15 ✓.

(2,3)(-2, -3): 4+6=104 + 6 = 10 ✓ and 9+6=159 + 6 = 15 ✓.

Solutions: (2,3)(2, 3) and (2,3)(-2, -3).

If you get this wrong, revise: [Simultaneous equations](#1-linear-simultaneous-equations)

:::tip Diagnostic Test Ready to test your understanding of Equations and Inequalities? The contains the hardest questions within the A-Level specification for this topic, each with a full worked solution.

Unit tests probe edge cases and common misconceptions. Integration tests combine Equations and Inequalities with other pure mathematics topics to test synthesis under exam conditions.

See for instructions on self-marking and building a personal test matrix. :::

Common Pitfalls

  1. Confusing the domain and range of functions, or not considering restrictions (e.g., denominator cannot be zero).

  2. Forgetting the +c+c constant of integration in indefinite integrals, or misusing boundary conditions in definite integrals.

  3. Rounding too early in multi-step calculations — carry full precision through and round only the final answer.

  4. Incorrectly applying integration by parts by choosing uu and dvdx\frac{dv}{dx} the wrong way around.

Summary

The key principles covered in this topic are linked in the sub-pages above. Focus on understanding the definitions, applying the formulas or frameworks, and evaluating strengths and limitations of each approach.

Worked Examples

Worked examples demonstrating the application of key concepts are covered in the detailed sub-pages linked above.