Definition. A quadratic function is a function of the form:
f(x)=ax2+bx+c
Where a,b,c∈R and a=0.
The graph of y=ax2+bx+c is a parabola — a symmetrical U-shaped curve (opening upwards if
a>0Downwards if a<0). The axis of symmetry is the vertical line x=−2ab.
2. Completing the Square
The technique of completing the square rewrites a quadratic in the form a(x−p)2+qFrom which
The vertex, axis of symmetry, and extremum are immediately readable.
Theorem. Every quadratic ax2+bx+c with a=0 can be written in the form
a(x−p)2+q for some p,q∈R.
Proof. Factor out a from the first two terms:
Ax2+bx+c=a(x2+abx)+c
We seek to express x2+abx as a perfect square plus a constant. Recall that:
Setting p=−2ab and q=4a4ac−b2We have ax2+bx+c=a(x−p)2+q.
■
Intuition (Geometric). Consider the expression x2+bx. This represents the area of a square of
Side x plus a rectangle of dimensions x×b. We split the rectangle into two strips of
x×2bAnd rearrange to form an L-shape. The “missing corner” to complete the Larger
square is a small square of side 2bWith area
(2b)2=4b2. We add and subtract this to preserve equality:
x2+bx=(x+2b)2−4b2
Example
Write 2x2−12x+22 in completed square form.
Intuition. The quadratic formula is nothing more than completing the square in fully symbolic
Form. Every step is reversible, so the formula is necessary and sufficient: it gives all solutions
And no extraneous ones.
:::info Edexcel provides the quadratic formula in the formula booklet. AQA and OCR (A) do not — you
Must memorise it.
:::
:::tip Before applying the formula, check whether the equation can be solved more by Factorisation.
Always check the discriminant first.
:::
4. The Discriminant
Definition. The discriminant of ax2+bx+c=0 is:
Δ=b2−4ac
Theorem. The nature of the roots of ax2+bx+c=0 is determined by the discriminant:
Condition
Number of Roots
Nature of Roots
Δ>0
2
Two distinct real roots
Δ=0
1
One repeated real root
Δ<0
0
No real roots (two complex conjugate roots)
Proof. From the quadratic formula, the roots are
x=L◆B◆−b±Δ◆RB◆◆LB◆2a◆RB◆.
If Δ>0: ◆LB◆Δ◆RB◆ is a positive real number, giving two distinct real values.
If Δ=0: both roots equal 2a−bA single repeated root.
If Δ<0: ◆LB◆Δ◆RB◆ is not a real number, so no real roots exist. (Complex
roots exist but are beyond this course.) ■
Example
Find the set of values of k for which x2+4x+k=0 has two distinct real roots.
Δ16−4kK=16−4k>0>0<4
4.1 Discriminant and Graph Shape
The discriminant directly determines the position of the parabola relative to the x-axis.
Theorem (Discriminant and Graph Position). Let f(x)=ax2+bx+c with a=0. In
Completed-square form, the extremum value is
f(−2ab)=−L◆B◆Δ◆RB◆◆LB◆4a◆RB◆. Therefore:
Δ>0: the extremum lies on the opposite side of the x-axis from the direction the
parabola opens, so the graph crosses the x-axis at two distinct points.
Δ=0: the vertex lies on the x-axis; the graph touches the axis at exactly one point.
Δ<0: the vertex lies on the same side of the x-axis as the direction the parabola
opens, so the graph never meets the axis.
Quadratic Graph and the Discriminant
Adjust sliders a, b, c to see how the quadratic y=ax2+bx+c changes. Observe how the
discriminant Δ=b2−4ac determines whether the curve crosses, touches, or misses the
x-axis.
Furthermore, when Δ<0:
Condition
Conclusion
a>0 and Δ<0
f(x)>0 for all x∈R (parabola entirely above)
a<0 and Δ<0
f(x)<0 for all x∈R (parabola entirely below)
Proof. From the completed-square form
f(x)=a(x+2ab)2−L◆B◆Δ◆RB◆◆LB◆4a◆RB◆The minimum value (when
a>0) or Maximum value (when a<0) equals −L◆B◆Δ◆RB◆◆LB◆4a◆RB◆Attained at
x=−2ab.
If a>0 and Δ>0: the minimum is −L◆B◆Δ◆RB◆◆LB◆4a◆RB◆<0So the vertex is
below the x-axis. Since the parabola opens upward, it must cross the axis twice.
If a>0 and Δ=0: the minimum is 0So the vertex sits on the x-axis.
If a>0 and Δ<0: the minimum is −L◆B◆Δ◆RB◆◆LB◆4a◆RB◆>0So the vertex is
above the x-axis, and f(x)≥−L◆B◆Δ◆RB◆◆LB◆4a◆RB◆>0 for all x.
The a<0 cases follow by symmetry (or by applying the above to −f(x)). ■
4.2 Repeated Roots: Geometric Interpretation
Definition. When Δ=0The equation ax2+bx+c=0 has a single repeated root
α=−2ab. We say α is a double root (or root of multiplicity 2), and the
Quadratic factors as a(x−α)2=0.
Theorem (Tangent at the Vertex). If f(x)=ax2+bx+c has a repeated root at αThen
The tangent to y=f(x) at x=α is the line y=0 (the x-axis itself).
Proof. Since α is a repeated root, f(α)=0. The derivative is f′(x)=2ax+b And
at the repeated root:
f′(α)=2a(−2ab)+b=−b+b=0
The tangent at x=α is y−f(α)=f′(α)(x−α)Which gives y=0.
■
This means that when Δ=0The x-axis is tangent to the parabola at the vertex. The Parabola
“kisses” the axis at one point and bounces back, rather than crossing it.
Example
Show that 4x2−12x+9=0 has a repeated root, and verify that the x-axis is tangent at that point.
Δ=(−12)2−4(4)(9)=144−144=0Confirming a repeated root.
The repeated root is x=812=23.
Verification:
f(23)=4(49)−12(23)+9=9−18+9=0.
f′(x)=8x−12So f′(23)=12−12=0. The tangent at x=23 Is
y=0Confirming the x-axis is tangent to the curve.
5. Solving Quadratic Equations
5.1 By Factorisation
If ax2+bx+c=0 can be written as (px+q)(rx+s)=0Then by the zero product property,
x=−q/p or x=−s/r.
5.2 By Completing the Square
Useful when the quadratic doesn’t factorise and you want to understand the geometry.
5.3 By the Formula
Always works (when Δ≥0), but can be computationally heavier.
6. Quadratic Inequalities
Solving ax2+bx+c>0 (or < 0$$\geq 0$$\leq 0) requires understanding the sign of the
Quadratic across the real line.
Method.
Find the roots of ax2+bx+c=0.
Sketch the parabola (knowing whether a>0 or a<0).
Read off the regions where the quadratic is positive or negative.
:::caution A critical error in inequalities: when multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative
Number, you must reverse the inequality sign. This is because multiplication by −1 is
Order-reversing: if a<bThen −a>−b.
:::
Theorem. If m<0 and a<bThen ma>mb.
Proof. From a<bWe have b−a>0. Since m<0 and b−a>0Their product m(b−a)<0.
So mb−ma<0Giving ma>mb. ■
Example
Solve x2−5x+6<0.
Factorise: (x−2)(x−3)<0.
The parabola opens upwards (coefficient of x2 is positive). It is negative between the roots:
Critical values: x=27 (numerator zero) and x=2 (denominator zero, undefined).
Sign analysis:
Interval
2x−7
x−2
Quotient
x<2
−
−
+
2<x<7/2
−
+
−
x>7/2
+
+
+
The quotient is ≥0 when x≤27 (including equality) but x=2.
Solution: x≤27, x=2I.e.,
x∈(−∞,2)∪[27,∞).
6.1 Rigorous Sign Chart Method
Theorem (Sign of a Factored Quadratic). Let f(x)=a(x−α)(x−β) with real roots
α<β and a=0. Then the sign of f on each interval is determined by:
Interval
Sign of f when a>0
Sign of f when a<0
x<α
+
−
α<x<β
−
+
x>β
+
−
Proof. Consider a>0. For x>β: both (x−α)>0 and (x−β)>0So
f(x)>0. For α<x<β: we have (x−α)>0 but (x−β)<0So their
Product is negative and f(x)<0. For x<α: both factors are negative, so their product is
Positive and f(x)>0. The a<0 case reverses all signs. ■
Corollary. For Δ=0 (repeated root α): f(x)=a(x−α)2 is always
Non-negative when a>0 and always non-positive when a<0With equality only at x=α.
Method (Systematic Sign Chart).
Rearrange the inequality to the form f(x)⪌0.
Factorise f(x) into linear factors if possible.
Identify all critical values: roots of the numerator, zeros of the denominator (if rational), and
any points where f is undefined.
Draw a sign chart: test one point from each interval between consecutive critical values.
Select the intervals that satisfy the original inequality, respecting strict (>, <) vs
non-strict (≥, ≤) conditions.
:::tip Tip never include points where the denominator is zero.
:::
Example
Solve −2x2+3x+5≥0 using a sign chart.
Factorise: −2x2+3x+5=−(2x2−3x−5)=−(2x−5)(x+1).
Critical values: x=25 and x=−1.
Sign chart for g(x)=(2x−5)(x+1) (then apply the leading minus sign):
Interval
2x−5
x+1
g(x)
−g(x)
x<−1
−
−
+
−
−1<x<5/2
−
+
−
+
x>5/2
+
+
+
−
We need −g(x)≥0Which occurs for −1≤x≤25.
Solution: x∈[−1,25].
7. Simultaneous Equations (Linear-Quadratic)
When solving a system of one linear and one quadratic equation, we substitute the linear equation
Into the quadratic.
The discriminant is positive, confirming two intersection points — which corresponds geometrically
To the line cutting the parabola twice.
:::tip The discriminant of the resulting quadratic tells you the number of intersection points
Between a line and a parabola: Δ>0 means 2 intersections, Δ=0 means tangent,
Δ<0 means no intersection.
:::
8. Quadratics in Disguise
Definition. A quadratic in disguise (or quadratic form equation) is an equation that is not
Quadratic in its stated variable, but can be reduced to a quadratic equation by an appropriate
Substitution.
Theorem. If an equation can be rewritten as a[g(x)]2+b[g(x)]+c=0
For some expression g(x) and constants a=0,b,cThen the substitution z=g(x) reduces It
to the quadratic az2+bz+c=0.
Common Patterns.
Original Form
Substitution
Reduced Equation
ax4+bx2+c=0
z=x2
az2+bz+c=0
a⋅p2x+b⋅px+c=0
z=px
az2+bz+c=0
acos2θ+bcosθ+c=0
z=cosθ
az2+bz+c=0
asin2θ+bsinθ+c=0
z=sinθ
az2+bz+c=0
a(x+x1)2+b(x+x1)+c=0
z=x+x1
az2+bz+c=0
:::caution After solving the reduced quadratic for zYou must substitute back to find x. Discard
any values of z that are incompatible with the substitution (e.g., z=x2 requires z≥0,
z=px requires z>0). Always verify solutions in the original equation.
:::
Example
Solve x4−13x2+36=0.
Let z=x2 (note z≥0). Then z2−13z+36=0.
Factorising: (z−4)(z−9)=0So z=4 or z=9.
Substituting back: x2=4⟹x=±2And x2=9⟹x=±3.
Solution: x∈{−3,−2,2,3}.
Example
Solve x+2−x3=0.
Multiply through by x (noting x=0):
x2+2x−3=0
(x+3)(x−1)=0⟹x=−3orx=1
Now consider the related equation x2+x24+2(x+x1)=0.
For each value of zSolve x+x1=zI.e., x2−zx+1=0 by the quadratic Formula.
This yields four solutions in total (two for each value of z), provided each resulting
Discriminant is non-negative.
9. Vieta’s Formulas
Theorem (Vieta’s Formulas). If α and β are the roots of ax2+bx+c=0 with
a=0Then:
α+β=−ab(SumofRoots)
αβ=ac(ProductofRoots)
Proof. By the factor theorem, since α and β are roots of ax2+bx+c=0We can
Write:
ax2+bx+c=a(x−α)(x−β)
Expanding the right-hand side:
a(x−α)(x−β)=a[x2−(α+β)x+αβ]=ax2−a(α+β)x+aαβ
Equating coefficients with ax2+bx+c:
Coefficient of x: b=−a(α+β)Hence α+β=−ab.
Constant term: c=aαβHence αβ=ac.
■
Corollary (Monic Case). For a monic quadratic x2+bx+c=0:
α+β=−bandαβ=c
9.1 Relationship Between Roots and Coefficients
Vieta’s formulas allow us to deduce properties of the roots directly from the coefficients, without
Solving the equation.
Theorem (Sign of Roots). Let α and β be real roots of ax2+bx+c=0 with
a>0 and Δ≥0. Then:
Condition on Roots
Condition on Coefficients
Via Vieta
Both roots positive
b<0 and c>0
α+β>0 and αβ>0
Both roots negative
b>0 and c>0
α+β<0 and αβ>0
Roots of opposite sign
c<0
αβ<0
One root is zero
c=0
αβ=0
Proof. We prove the first case; the others follow similarly.
Both roots positive means α+β>0 and αβ>0. By Vieta:
α+β=−abSo −ab>0⟹b<0 (since a>0). Also
αβ=acSo ac>0⟹c>0.
Conversely, if b<0 and c>0Then α+β=−ab>0 and
αβ=ac>0. Since both the sum and product are positive, both roots must be
Positive (if one were negative and the other positive, their product would be negative; if both were
Negative, their sum would be negative). ■
9.2 Constructing Equations from Roots
Given two numbers α and βThe monic quadratic with those roots is:
x2−(α+β)x+αβ=0
More generally, the quadratic with leading coefficient a is:
ax2−a(α+β)x+aαβ=0
Example
Find the quadratic equation with roots α=3 and β=−5.
Sum: α+β=−2. Product: αβ=−15.
Monic equation: x2−(−2)x+(−15)=0I.e., x2+2x−15=0.
Verification: (x−3)(x+5)=x2+2x−15. Correct.
9.3 Symmetric Functions of Roots
A symmetric function of α and β is one that is unchanged when α and β
Are swapped. Vieta’s formulas allow us to evaluate many symmetric functions without finding the
Roots individually.
Example
The roots of x2−5x+2=0 are α and β. Find a quadratic equation whose roots are α2 and β2.
We need the sum S=α2+β2 and product P=α2β2.
S=(α+β)2−2αβ=25−4=21.
P=(αβ)2=4.
The required equation is x2−Sx+P=0I.e., x2−21x+4=0.
10. Applying Quadratic Theory to Other Equations
Many equations that are not quadratic can be solved by recognising quadratic structure or By
algebraic manipulation that produces a quadratic.
10.1 Exponential Equations
Method. For equations of the form a⋅p2x+b⋅px+c=0 where p>0
Substitute u=px (so u>0) to obtain a quadratic in u. After solving, take logarithms to
Recover x.
Example
Solve 32x−4⋅3x−5=0.
Let u=3x (u>0). The equation becomes:
u2−4u−5=0
(u−5)(u+1)=0
u=5 or u=−1. Since u>0Reject u=−1.
3x=5⟹x=log35=L◆B◆ln5◆RB◆◆LB◆ln3◆RB◆.
10.2 Trigonometric Equations
Method. Equations such as acos2θ+bcosθ+c=0 are quadratic in cosθ.
Solve for the trigonometric ratio, then find θ within the specified interval. Always check
That the values fall within the valid range [−1,1].
Equations involving f(x) can sometimes be reduced to quadratics by isolating the radical
And squaring both sides.
:::caution Squaring both sides of an equation is not reversible — it can introduce extraneous
Solutions. You must always substitute every candidate solution back into the original equation
To verify it.
:::
Example
Solve 2x+1=x−1.
First, note the domain restrictions: 2x+1≥0 (so x≥−1/2) and x−1≥0 (so
x≥1) since a square root is non-negative.
Squaring both sides: 2x+1=(x−1)2=x2−2x+1.
x2−4x=0⟹x(x−4)=0⟹x=0orx=4
Check x=0: 1=−1? No, 1=−1. Reject (also fails x≥1).
Check x=4: 9=3? Yes, 3=3. Accept.
Solution: x=4.
11. Problem Set
Problem 1. Write 3x2−12x+7 in the form a(x−p)2+qAnd hence state the minimum Value
and the value of x at which it occurs.
Problem 3. Find the range of values of k for which kx2−6x+4=0 has real roots.
Solution
We need Δ≥0:
36−16kK≥0≤1636=49
Note: k=0 (otherwise it’s not quadratic). If k=0The equation −6x+4=0 still has a
Real root, so the condition is k≤49 with k real (including k=0Which gives a
Linear equation).
:::tip Diagnostic Test Ready to test your understanding of Quadratics? The contains the hardest questions
within the A-Level specification for this topic, each with a full worked solution.
Unit tests probe edge cases and common misconceptions. Integration tests combine Quadratics
with other pure mathematics topics to test synthesis under exam conditions.
See for instructions on self-marking and
building a personal test matrix.
Common Pitfalls
Losing marks by not showing sufficient working — always write out each step, especially in proof
questions.
Incorrectly applying integration by parts by choosing u and dxdv the wrong way
around.
Misreading the question, particularly with ‘hence’ vs ‘hence or otherwise’ — the former requires
using previous work.
Rounding too early in multi-step calculations — carry full precision through and round only the
final answer.
Summary
The key principles covered in this topic are linked in the sub-pages above. Focus on understanding
the definitions, applying the formulas or frameworks, and evaluating strengths and limitations of
each approach.
Worked Examples
Worked examples demonstrating the application of key concepts are covered in the detailed sub-pages
linked above.