Definition. A surd is an irrational number expressible as the root of a rational number — that Is, an expression of the form n where n∈Q+ and n∈/Q.
The most familiar surds are \sqrt{2}$$\sqrt{3}$$\sqrt{5}And so on. The set of surds is a Subset of the algebraic numbers, and they arise whenever we solve equations of degree 2 or Higher.
These follow directly from the laws of indices (which we prove in Section 2), since a=a1/2.
Rationalising the denominator. If a fraction has a surd in the denominator, we multiply Numerator and denominator by the surd (or its conjugate) to eliminate it.
For a denominator of the form aMultiply by aa:
a1=a1⋅aa=aa
For a denominator of the form a+bcMultiply by the conjugatea−bc:
a+bc1=(a+bc)(a−bc)a−bc=a2−b2ca−bc### 1.2 Irrationality of $\sqrt{2}$
Theorem.2 is irrational.
Proof. We proceed by contradiction. Assume 2 is rational. Then 2=qp Where p, q \in \mathbb{Z}^+$$q \neq 0And gcd(p,q)=1 (i.e., the fraction is in lowest Terms).
22P2=qp=q2p2=2q2
Since p2=2q2We have that p2 is even. A standard result (proved below) tells us that if p2 is even, then p is even. So p=2k for some integer k.
Substituting: (2k)2=2q2So 4k2=2q2Hence q2=2k2.
By the same argument, q2 is even, so q is even. But this contradicts gcd(p,q)=1 since Both p and q are divisible by 2. Therefore our assumption was false, and 2 is Irrational. ■
Lemma. If p2 is even, then p is even.
Proof. The contrapositive: if p is odd, then p2 is odd. If p=2k+1Then p2=4k2+4k+1=2(2k2+2k)+1Which is odd. ■
Intuition. This proof exploits the structure of divisibility: the number 2 has a unique prime Factorisation, and squaring preserves parity. The contradiction arises because 2 “forces” factors Of 2 into both p and qMaking the fraction reducible.
Proof of am⋅an=am+n for positive integer exponents.
Am⋅an=ma⋅a⋯a⋅na⋅a⋯a=m+na⋅a⋯a=am+n
The extension to rational and real exponents requires more sophisticated machinery (continuity Arguments and the exponential function), which we develop in Exponentials and Logarithms.
Intuition. Exponentiation is repeated multiplication, so multiplying two powers of the same base Adds the counts. Just as 3×5 counts 3+5 groups of size 1, a3⋅a5 counts 3+5=8 factors of a.
A cubic ax3+bx2+cx+d can be factorised by finding one root α (using the Factor Theorem), then dividing by (x−α) to obtain a quadratic, which can then be factorised.
More systematically, the division algorithm tells us:
Theorem (Polynomial Division Algorithm). For polynomials f(x) and g(x) with g(x)=0 There exist unique polynomials q(x) (the quotient) and r(x) (the remainder) such that:
f(x)=g(x)⋅q(x)+r(x)
Where deg(r)<deg(g) or r(x)=0.
Intuition. This is exactly analogous to integer division: 47=5×9+2Where 0≤2<5. In polynomials, the “size” ordering is replaced by degree, and the remainder must Have smaller degree than the divisor.
4.2 Why Polynomial Division Mirrors Integer Long Division
The structural analogy is deep. Both are instances of a Euclidean domain — an algebraic structure Where we can perform division with remainder. In ZThe “degree” is the absolute value; In R[x]The degree is the polynomial degree. The algorithm is the same: at each step, Eliminate the leading term.
Theorem (Remainder Theorem). If a polynomial f(x) is divided by (x−a)The remainder is f(a).
Proof. By the division algorithm, f(x)=(x−a)⋅q(x)+rWhere r is a constant (since deg(r)<deg(x−a)=1).
Substituting x=a:
F(a)=(a−a)⋅q(a)+r=0⋅q(a)+r=r■
Intuition. When you plug in x=aThe (x−a) factor vanishes, leaving only the remainder. The remainder is the “leftover” that doesn”t contain the factor (x−a).
Theorem (Factor Theorem).(x−a) is a factor of f(x) if and only if f(a)=0.
Proof.
(⇒) If (x−a) is a factor, then f(x)=(x−a)⋅q(x). Setting x=a: f(a)=(a−a)⋅q(a)=0.
(⇐) If f(a)=0Then by the Remainder Theorem, the remainder upon division by (x−a) is f(a)=0. So f(x)=(x−a)⋅q(x)Meaning (x−a) is a factor. ■
Intuition. The Factor Theorem connects algebra (polynomials) to geometry (roots on the x-axis). A root x=a means the graph crosses the x-axis at aWhich means (x−a) must divide the Polynomial.
ExampleShow that $(x - 2)$ is a factor of $f(x) = x^3 - 3x^2 + 4$.
By the Factor Theorem, we check f(2):
F(2)=23−3(2)2+4=8−12+4=0
Since f(2)=0, (x−2) is a factor. To find the remaining factor, we perform polynomial Division:
If you get this wrong, revise: [Algebraic fractions](#6-simplifying-algebraic-fractions) and [Quadratics](02-quadratics.mdx)
Problem 11. Given that x3+ax2+bx+c is exactly divisible by (x−1)2 and leaves Remainder 12 when divided by (x+2)Find a, bAnd c.
SolutionSince $(x - 1)^2$ is a factor, both $f(1) = 0$ and $f'(1) = 0$. F(1)F′(x)F′(1)=1+a+b+c=0−−−(1)=3x2+2ax+b=3+2a+b=0−−−(2)
Also f(−2)=12:
−8+4a−2b+c4a−2b+c=12=20−−−(3)
From (2): b=−3−2a.
From (1): c=−1−a−b=−1−a+3+2a=2+a.
Substituting into (3): 4a−2(−3−2a)+(2+a)=20
4a+6+4a+2+a=20⟹9a+8=20⟹a=912=34
b=−3−38=−317,c=2+34=310
If you get this wrong, revise: [Remainder and Factor theorems](#5-the-factor-theorem-and-remainder-theorem)
Problem 12. Simplify x2+5x+6x2−9÷x2−x−6x2−4x+3.
SolutionFactorise all quadratics: (x+2)(x+3)(x−3)(x+3)÷(x−3)(x+2)(x−1)(x−3)=(x+2)(x+3)(x−3)(x+3)×(x−1)(x−3)(x−3)(x+2)=(x+2)(x+3)(x−1)(x−3)(x−3)2(x+3)(x+2)=x−1x−3
For x=−3,−2,1,3.
If you get this wrong, revise: [Factorisation](#32-factorisation) and [Algebraic fractions](#6-simplifying-algebraic-fractions)
Problem 13. Find the value of k such that x2+kx+(k+3) is a perfect square.
SolutionA perfect square has discriminant $\Delta = 0$: K2−4(k+3)K2−4k−12(k−6)(k+2)=0=0=0
k=6: gives x2+6x+9=(x+3)2 ✓
k=−2: gives x2−2x+1=(x−1)2 ✓
If you get this wrong, revise: [Quadratics](02-quadratics.mdx)