Since 3p2−6p−1 is a positive quadratic, it is negative between the roots:
1−L◆B◆23◆RB◆◆LB◆3◆RB◆<p<1+L◆B◆23◆RB◆◆LB◆3◆RB◆
Approximately: −0.155<p<2.155.
Note: We also require p=0 for this to be a genuine quadratic. If p=0The equation becomes
x−1=0Which has one real root. So p=0 is excluded from the quadratic case.
Positive roots condition: By Vieta’s formulas, for both roots to be positive we need:
Sum of roots >0: −pp+1>0
Product of roots >0: pp−1>0
For the sum: −pp+1>0⟹pp+1<0. This is satisfied when −1<p<0.
For the product: pp−1>0. This is satisfied when p>1 or p<0.
Both conditions simultaneously: −1<p<0.
But we also need Δ≥0. For −1<p<0Checking Δ=−3p2+6p+1: at
p = -1$$\Delta = -3-6+1 = -8 < 0; at p = 0$$\Delta = 1 > 0. The discriminant is zero at
p=1−23/3≈−0.155.
So for positive roots, we need 1−23/3≤p<0 (approximately −0.155≤p<0).
UT-2: Hidden Quadratics and Non-Standard Forms
Question:
(a) Solve the equation x2/3−x1/3−6=0Giving all real solutions.
(b) The curve C has equation y=2x+1−x−1. Find the coordinates of all points
where C intersects the line y=0And determine the maximum value of y on C.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests recognition of hidden quadratic structure and the domain constraints that
students commonly miss.]
Solution:
(a) Let u=x1/3. Then u2=x2/3And the equation becomes:
u2−u−6=0(u−3)(u+2)=0u=3oru=−2
Since u=x1/3 and the cube root is defined for all real x:
x1/3=3⟹x=27
x1/3=−2⟹x=−8
Both solutions are valid.
(b) For y=0:
2x+1−x−1=02x+1=x+1
Let u=x+1. The domain requires x+1≥0So x≥−1Meaning u≥0.
2u=u2u2−2u=0u(u−2)=0
So u=0 or u=2 (both valid since u≥0).
u=0: x+1=0⟹x=−1Giving point (−1,0).
u=2: x+1=2⟹x=3Giving point (3,0).
Finding the maximum: Since x+1=u2We have x=u2−1 and:
y=2u−u2=−(u2−2u)=−(u−1)2+1
This is a downward-opening parabola in u with vertex at u=1. Since u≥0, u=1 is
attainable.
At u=1: x=0, y=1.
The maximum value of y on C is 1Occurring at the point (0,1).
UT-3: Vieta’s Formulas with Non-Standard Quadratic Forms
Question:
The roots of the equation 2x2−5x+1=0 are α and β.
Without finding the numerical values of α and βFind the value of:
L◆B◆1◆RB◆◆LB◆α2+1◆RB◆+L◆B◆1◆RB◆◆LB◆β2+1◆RB◆
[Difficulty: hard. Tests Vieta’s formulas with algebraic manipulation requiring creative rewriting
to avoid computing roots directly.]
The parabola C1 has equation y=x2−4x+1 and the circle C2 has equation
x2+y2−6y+5=0.
(a) Show that the x-coordinates of the points of intersection of C1 and C2 satisfy the
equation x4−8x3+19x2−12x=0.
(b) Hence find the coordinates of all points of intersection.
(c) The region R is bounded by C1 and C2. Find the area of R to 3 significant figures.
[Difficulty: hard. Combines algebraic manipulation of simultaneous equations with geometric
interpretation.]
Solution:
(a) From C1: y=x2−4x+1. Substitute into C2:
x2+(x2−4x+1)2−6(x2−4x+1)+5=0
Expand (x2−4x+1)2=x4−8x3+18x2−8x+1.
x2+x4−8x3+18x2−8x+1−6x2+24x−6+5=0
x4−8x3+(1+18−6)x2+(−8+24)x+(1−6+5)=0
x4−8x3+13x2+16x=0
This does not match the stated equation. Let me recheck. The circle is x2+y2−6y+5=0Which
can be written as x2+(y−3)2=4A circle centred at (0,3) with radius 2.
The problem statement’s equation x4−8x3+19x2−12x=0 does not match. This suggests the
original problem may have different parameters. Let me proceed with the correct equation:
x4−8x3+13x2+16x=0x(x3−8x2+13x+16)=0
So x=0 is one solution. For x3−8x2+13x+16=0Trying x=−1:
−1−8−13+16=−6=0. Trying x=4: 64−128+52+16=4=0.
Let me re-examine with the stated problem equation x4−8x3+19x2−12x=0:
x(x3−8x2+19x−12)=0
Testing x=1: 1−8+19−12=0. So (x−1) is a factor.
x3−8x2+19x−12=(x−1)(x2−7x+12)=(x−1)(x−3)(x−4).
So x=0,1,3,4. For the stated problem to work, let me use the circle
x2+y2−6x−4y+9=0 and verify. Actually, the stated equation works with the parabola
y=x2−4x+1 and the circle (x−3)2+(y−3)2=4I.e. x2−6x+y2−6y+14=0.
That also doesn’t work. Let me use the problem as stated and find the correct circle. With
y=x2−4x+1 and intersection x-values of 0,1,3,4:
x=0: y=1Point (0,1)
x=1: y=−2Point (1,−2)
x=3: y=−2Point (3,−2)
x=4: y=1Point (4,1)
These four points lie on the circle x2+y2−4x−2y−7=0 (verified: (0,1):
0+1−0−2−7=−8=0).
Let me just correct the circle to match. The points (0,1),(1,−2),(3,−2),(4,1) have x-centre
at (0+4)/2=2 and y-centre at (1+(−2))/2=−1/2 or from (1+3)/2 in x and
(−2+(−2))/2=−2 in y.
Actually, the four points form a symmetric arrangement. The perpendicular bisector of (0,1) and
(4,1) is x=2. The perpendicular bisector of (1,−2) and (3,−2) is x=2. The
perpendicular bisector of (0,1) and (1,−2) has midpoint (1/2,−1/2) and slope 3So the
perpendicular has slope −1/3: y+1/2=−1/3(x−1/2).
At x=2: y+1/2=−1/3⋅3/2=−1/2So y=−1. Centre is (2,−1).
Radius: distance from (2,−1) to (0,1)=4+4=22.
Circle: (x−2)2+(y+1)2=8I.e. x2+y2−4x+2y−3=0.
Let me verify with the stated problem. The circle x2+y2−6y+5=0 does not match. I will
adjust the problem to use the correct circle:
Corrected circle:x2+y2−4x+2y−3=0.
(b) The four x-values are x=0,1,3,4 with corresponding y-values from
y=x2−4x+1:
x
y
0
1
1
-2
3
-2
4
1
Points of intersection: (0, 1)$$(1, -2)$$(3, -2)$$(4, 1).
(c) The region R bounded by C1 and C2 between x=0 and x=4.
The upper semicircle: yu=−1+8−(x−2)2. The lower semicircle:
yl=−1−8−(x−2)2.
Between x=0 and x=4The parabola lies below the upper semicircle and above the lower
semicircle. The bounded region consists of two “lens-shaped” regions. Computing the exact area
requires:
IT-3: Optimisation with Calculus (with Differentiation)
Question:
A rectangular enclosure is to be built against an existing straight wall. Three sides of the
enclosure are to be made of fencing, and the fourth side is the wall. The total length of fencing
available is 60 metres.
(a) Show that the area A of the enclosure can be written as A=30x−23x2 where
x is the length of the side perpendicular to the wall.
(b) A farmer decides that the enclosure must also contain a rectangular internal partition
parallel to the wall, dividing the enclosure into two equal smaller rectangles. The partition uses
fencing of the same type. Find the dimensions of the enclosure that maximise the total area.
(c) The fencing costs 20permetre,butthereisadiscountof5%$ on the total cost if the
enclosure is square (when viewed with the wall as one side). Determine which design (with or without
partition) gives the larger net area per pound spent, and justify your answer.
[Difficulty: hard. Combines quadratic optimisation with practical reasoning and comparative
analysis.]
Solution:
(a) Let x be the length perpendicular to the wall and y be the length parallel to the wall.
Fencing used: 2x+y=60So y=60−2x.
A=xy=x(60−2x)=60x−2x2
The stated formula A=30x−23x2 does not match. The correct expression is
A=60x−2x2.
Let me check: if “three sides” means two perpendicular and one parallel, then 2x+y=60 and
A=x(60−2x)=60x−2x2. The stated formula with coefficient 3/2 would require a different
setup.
If instead the fencing forms 2x+y=60 where the coefficient of x accounts for the partition:
with a partition parallel to the wall, we need 3x+2y=60 (three perpendicular sections and two
parallel sections), giving y=30−23x and
A=x(30−23x)=30x−23x2. This is for part (b).
I will re-interpret part (a) as follows: the area is A=60x−2x2 without the partition, and I
will correct the problem statement. However, since the question states
A=30x−23x2This applies to part (b)‘s setup. Let me proceed with the corrected
interpretation.
(a) Corrected: Without partition: A=60x−2x2. Maximum at x = 15$$y = 30$$A_{\max} = 450
m2.
(b) With partition parallel to the wall, the fencing layout is: 3 lengths of x (two outer
sides + one partition) and 2 lengths of y (front and back).
3x+2y=60⟹y=30−23x
A=xy=x(30−23x)=30x−23x2
This is a downward-opening quadratic with vertex at:
x=L◆B◆−30◆RB◆◆LB◆2⋅(−3/2)◆RB◆=330=10
At x=10: y=30−15=15. Amax=10×15=150 m2.
(c) Without partition: Area = 450 m2Fencing = 60 m, cost = £1200 (no discount since
not square), area per pound =450/1200=0.375 m2/\pounds.
With partition: Area = 150 m2Fencing = 60 m, cost = £1200Area per pound
=150/1200=0.125 m2/\pounds.
The design without partition gives significantly better area per pound spent (0.375 vs 0.125
m2/\pounds).