(b) A student chooses u=x3 and dxdv=lnx for integration by parts. Explain why this choice is problematic, and show what happens if the student persists with it.
(c) Using your result from part (a), evaluate ∫1ex3lnxdx exactly.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests the LIATE priority rule for integration by parts, and the consequences of choosing the wrong assignment.]
Solution:
(a) By LIATE (Logarithmic, Inverse trig, Algebraic, Trigonometric, Exponential), lnx is prioritised for u.
Set u=lnx, dxdv=x3.
du=x1dx, v=4x4.
∫x3lnxdx=4x4lnx−∫4x4⋅x1dx
=4x4lnx−41∫x3dx
=4x4lnx−16x4+C
=16x4(4lnx−1)+C
(b) If the student chooses u=x3 and dxdv=lnx:
du=3x2dxBut v=∫lnxdx=xlnx−x (which itself requires integration by parts to find).
Then:
∫x3lnxdx=x3(xlnx−x)−∫3x2(xlnx−x)dx
=x4lnx−x4−3∫x3lnxdx+3∫x3dx
=x4lnx−x4−3∫x3lnxdx+43x4
This produces an equation involving the original integral:
∫x3lnxdx=x4lnx−4x4−3∫x3lnxdx
4∫x3lnxdx=x4lnx−4x4
∫x3lnxdx=4x4lnx−16x4
This eventually works but requires more steps and an additional integration by parts just to find v. The LIATE choice is more efficient.
(c)∫1ex3lnxdx=[16x4(4lnx−1)]1e
At x=e: 16e4(4−1)=163e4
At x=1: 161(0−1)=−161
=163e4−(−161)=163e4+1
UT-2: Forgetting to Change Limits in Definite Integration by Substitution
(a) Evaluate ∫01x1+x2dx using the substitution u=1+x2.
(b) A student uses the substitution u=1+x2 but forgets to change the limits. The student computes the indefinite integral, then substitutes x=0 and x=1 back into the x-expression. Show that this approach gives the correct answer, and explain why this works in this particular case.
(c) A second student evaluates ∫02πxcosxdx by integration by parts and obtains xsinx+cosx+C. They then write ∫02πxcosxdx=[2πsin2π+cos2π]−[0+cos0]=2π−1. A third student forgets to evaluate the lower limit and writes only 2π+0=2π. What percentage error does the third student make?
[Difficulty: hard. Tests the boundary between when forgetting to change limits produces errors versus when back-substitution rescues the answer, and lower-limit negligence.]
Solution:
(a)u=1+x2, du=2xdxSo xdx=21du.
When x=0: u=1. When x=1: u=2.
∫01x1+x2dx=∫12u⋅21du=21∫12u1/2du
=21[32u3/2]12=31(23/2−1)=31(22−1)
(b) The indefinite integral (back-substituted) is:
31(1+x2)3/2+C
Evaluating from x=0 to x=1:
31(23/2)−31(13/2)=322−1
This gives the same answer as part (a). Back-substitution always works because it restores the original variable, and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus applies regardless of which variable is used. The error of forgetting limits occurs only when the student evaluates in u-space with the original x-limits (e.g., evaluating 31u3/2 from u=0 to u=1Which is wrong).
(b) A student writes ∫−2−1x2dx=[2lnx]−2−1 and concludes the integral is undefined. Explain the error and find the correct value.
(c) Evaluate ∫−33x2+1xdx.
(d) Evaluate ∫−11x1dx or show that it does not exist.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests the absolute value in the antiderivative of x1And the improper integral when the integrand has a singularity within the interval.]
The result is negative because the integrand x2 is negative on [−2,−1] (since x<0).
(b) The student writes lnx instead of ln∣x∣. Since x is negative in this interval, lnx is undefined. The correct antiderivative is ln∣x∣Which is defined for x=0.
The correct answer is −2ln2As computed in part (a).
(c) Note that f(x)=x2+1x is an odd function: f(−x)=x2+1−x=−f(x).
Since the integral of an odd function over [−a,a] is zero:
∫−33x2+1xdx=0
Verification: ∫x2+1xdx=21ln(x2+1)+C. Evaluating from −3 to 3:
21(ln10−ln10)=0
(d)∫−11x1dx has a singularity at x=0. We must split:
∫−11x1dx=lima→0−∫−1ax1dx+limb→0+∫b1x1dx
=lima→0−[ln∣x∣]−1a+limb→0+[ln∣x∣]b1
=lima→0−(ln∣a∣−ln1)+limb→0+(ln1−ln∣b∣)
=lima→0−ln∣a∣+limb→0+(−ln∣b∣)
=−∞+∞
This is an indeterminate form. The integral does not converge; it is an improper integral that diverges. The answer is that ∫−11x1dx does not exist.
A student who writes [ln∣x∣]−11=0−0=0 is making a serious error by applying the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus across a singularity.
A particle moves in a plane with velocity vector v=(t2−2t)i+2tj m/s, where t≥0.
(a) Find the displacement of the particle from t=0 to t=3.
(b) Find the total distance travelled by the particle from t=0 to t=3.
[Difficulty: hard. Requires integrating a velocity vector component-by-component for displacement, and recognising that distance requires integrating the magnitude of velocity (not the velocity components).]
(a) Find ∫sin2xdx using the double angle identity.
(b) Hence evaluate ∫0πsin2xdx and interpret the result geometrically.
(c) Evaluate ∫04πsin2xcos2xdx using appropriate identities.
(d) Given that ∫02πsinnxdx=nn−1∫02πsinn−2xdx for n≥2 (Wallis’ reduction formula), find ∫02πsin6xdx.
[Difficulty: hard. Combines trigonometric identities with integration, culminating in the Wallis reduction formula.]
Solution:
(a) Using sin2x=21−cos2x:
∫sin2xdx=∫21−cos2xdx=21x−41sin2x+C
(b)∫0πsin2xdx=[21x−41sin2x]0π=2π−0=2π.
Geometrically, this is the area between the curve y=sin2x and the x-axis from x=0 to x=π. Since sin2x≥0The area equals the integral. The result 2π equals the area of a semicircle of radius 1, which is a coincidence related to the fact that sin2x and cos2x each average to 21 over a full period.
(b) Find the integral ∫x+1xdx using the substitution u=x+1And confirm the student’s answer.
(c) Hence evaluate ∫03x+1xdx exactly.
(d) A different student claims ∫x+11dx=2x+1+C. Use differentiation to verify, then use this result together with part (b) to find ∫03x+1x+1dx without further integration.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests verification by differentiation, substitution technique, and decomposition of integrals using known results.]
Forgetting the absolute value in ∫x1dx=ln∣x∣+C: The antiderivative of x1 is ln∣x∣, not lnx. Writing lnx is only valid for x>0. When integrating over an interval that includes negative values (e.g., ∫−2−1), you must use ln∣x∣ to get the correct result.
Applying the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus across a singularity: If the integrand has a discontinuity within the interval of integration (e.g., x1 at x=0), you must split the integral and treat it as a limit. Writing [ln∣x∣]−11=0 is incorrect because the integral diverges at x=0.
Confusing displacement with distance travelled: Displacement is ∫vdt (can be positive or negative). Distance is ∫∣v∣dt (always positive). Students often compute displacement when the question asks for distance, or vice versa. When the velocity changes sign, you must split the integral at the point where v=0.