Tests edge cases, boundary conditions, and common misconceptions for integration.
UT-1: Integration by Parts — Choosing u and dxdv Correctly
Question:
(a) Find ∫x3lnxdx.
(b) A student chooses u=x3 and dxdv=lnx for integration by parts. Explain
why this choice is problematic, and show what happens if the student persists with it.
(c) Using your result from part (a), evaluate ∫1ex3lnxdx exactly.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests the LIATE priority rule for integration by parts, and the consequences of
choosing the wrong assignment.]
Solution:
(a) By LIATE (Logarithmic, Inverse trig, Algebraic, Trigonometric, Exponential), lnx is
prioritised for u.
Set u=lnx, dxdv=x3.
du=x1dx, v=4x4.
∫x3lnxdx=4x4lnx−∫4x4⋅x1dx
=4x4lnx−41∫x3dx
=4x4lnx−16x4+C
=16x4(4lnx−1)+C
(b) If the student chooses u=x3 and dxdv=lnx:
du=3x2dxBut v=∫lnxdx=xlnx−x (which itself requires integration by parts
to find).
Then:
∫x3lnxdx=x3(xlnx−x)−∫3x2(xlnx−x)dx
=x4lnx−x4−3∫x3lnxdx+3∫x3dx
=x4lnx−x4−3∫x3lnxdx+43x4
This produces an equation involving the original integral:
∫x3lnxdx=x4lnx−4x4−3∫x3lnxdx
4∫x3lnxdx=x4lnx−4x4
∫x3lnxdx=4x4lnx−16x4
This eventually works but requires more steps and an additional integration by parts just to find
v. The LIATE choice is more efficient.
(c)∫1ex3lnxdx=[16x4(4lnx−1)]1e
At x=e: 16e4(4−1)=163e4
At x=1: 161(0−1)=−161
=163e4−(−161)=163e4+1
UT-2: Forgetting to Change Limits in Definite Integration by Substitution
Question:
(a) Evaluate ∫01x1+x2dx using the substitution u=1+x2.
(b) A student uses the substitution u=1+x2 but forgets to change the limits. The student
computes the indefinite integral, then substitutes x=0 and x=1 back into the x-expression.
Show that this approach gives the correct answer, and explain why this works in this particular
case.
(c) A second student evaluates ∫0L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆xcosxdx by integration
by parts and obtains xsinx+cosx+C. They then write
∫0L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆xcosxdx=[L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆sinL◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆+cosL◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆]−[0+cos0]=L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆−1.
A third student forgets to evaluate the lower limit and writes only
L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆+0=L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆. What percentage error does the third
student make?
[Difficulty: hard. Tests the boundary between when forgetting to change limits produces errors
versus when back-substitution rescues the answer, and lower-limit negligence.]
Solution:
(a)u=1+x2, du=2xdxSo xdx=21du.
When x=0: u=1. When x=1: u=2.
∫01x1+x2dx=∫12u⋅21du=21∫12u1/2du
=21[32u3/2]12=31(23/2−1)=31(22−1)
(b) The indefinite integral (back-substituted) is:
31(1+x2)3/2+C
Evaluating from x=0 to x=1:
31(23/2)−31(13/2)=L◆B◆22−1◆RB◆◆LB◆3◆RB◆
This gives the same answer as part (a). Back-substitution always works because it restores the
original variable, and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus applies regardless of which variable is
used. The error of forgetting limits occurs only when the student evaluates in u-space with the
original x-limits (e.g., evaluating 31u3/2 from u=0 to u=1Which is wrong).
(c) Correct answer: L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆−1≈0.5708.
Third student’s answer: L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆≈1.5708.
The third student’s answer is 175.2% too large — a catastrophic error from omitting a single
term.
UT-3: Absolute Value in ∫x1dx=ln∣x∣
Question:
(a) Evaluate ∫−2−1x2dx.
(b) A student writes ∫−2−1x2dx=[2lnx]−2−1 and concludes the
integral is undefined. Explain the error and find the correct value.
(c) Evaluate ∫−33x2+1xdx.
(d) Evaluate ∫−11x1dx or show that it does not exist.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests the absolute value in the antiderivative of x1And the improper
integral when the integrand has a singularity within the interval.]
The result is negative because the integrand x2 is negative on [−2,−1] (since
x<0).
(b) The student writes lnx instead of ln∣x∣. Since x is negative in this
interval, lnx is undefined. The correct antiderivative is ln∣x∣Which is defined
for x=0.
The correct answer is −2ln2As computed in part (a).
(c) Note that f(x)=x2+1x is an odd function: f(−x)=x2+1−x=−f(x).
Since the integral of an odd function over [−a,a] is zero:
∫−33x2+1xdx=0
Verification: ∫x2+1xdx=21ln(x2+1)+C. Evaluating from −3 to 3:
21(ln10−ln10)=0
(d)∫−11x1dx has a singularity at x=0. We must split:
∫−11x1dx=lima→0−∫−1ax1dx+limb→0+∫b1x1dx
=lima→0−[ln∣x∣]−1a+limb→0+[ln∣x∣]b1
=lima→0−(ln∣a∣−ln1)+limb→0+(ln1−ln∣b∣)
=lima→0−ln∣a∣+limb→0+(−ln∣b∣)
=−∞+∞
This is an indeterminate form. The integral does not converge; it is an improper integral that
diverges. The answer is that ∫−11x1dx does not exist.
A student who writes [ln∣x∣]−11=0−0=0 is making a serious error by applying
the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus across a singularity.
Integration Tests
Tests synthesis of integration with other topics. Requires combining concepts from multiple units.
IT-1: Velocity Vector Integration for Displacement and Distance (with Vectors)
Question:
A particle moves in a plane with velocity vector
v=(t2−2t)i+2tj m/s, where t≥0.
(a) Find the displacement of the particle from t=0 to t=3.
(b) Find the total distance travelled by the particle from t=0 to t=3.
[Difficulty: hard. Requires integrating a velocity vector component-by-component for displacement,
and recognising that distance requires integrating the magnitude of velocity (not the velocity
components).]
IT-2: Integrating sin2x Using the Double Angle Identity (with Trigonometry)
Question:
(a) Find ∫sin2xdx using the double angle identity.
(b) Hence evaluate ∫0πsin2xdx and interpret the result geometrically.
(c) Evaluate ∫0L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆4◆RB◆sin2xcos2xdx using appropriate
identities.
(d) Given that
∫0L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆sinnxdx=nn−1∫0L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆sinn−2xdx
for n≥2 (Wallis’ reduction formula), find ∫0L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆sin6xdx.
[Difficulty: hard. Combines trigonometric identities with integration, culminating in the Wallis
reduction formula.]
Geometrically, this is the area between the curve y=sin2x and the x-axis from x=0 to
x=π. Since sin2x≥0The area equals the integral. The result
L◆B◆π◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆ equals the area of a semicircle of radius 1, which is a coincidence
related to the fact that sin2x and cos2x each average to 21 over a full period.
(d) A different student claims ∫L◆B◆1◆RB◆◆LB◆x+1◆RB◆dx=2x+1+C.
Use differentiation to verify, then use this result together with part (b) to find
∫03L◆B◆x+1◆RB◆◆LB◆x+1◆RB◆dx without further integration.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests verification by differentiation, substitution technique, and decomposition
of integrals using known results.]
So
∫03L◆B◆x+1◆RB◆◆LB◆x+1◆RB◆dx=∫03(x+1)1/2dx=[32(x+1)3/2]03=32(8−1)=314.
Alternatively, using linearity:
∫03L◆B◆x+1◆RB◆◆LB◆x+1◆RB◆dx=∫03L◆B◆x◆RB◆◆LB◆x+1◆RB◆dx+∫03L◆B◆1◆RB◆◆LB◆x+1◆RB◆dx=38+[2x+1]03=38+2(2−1)=38+2=314.
Confirmed.