Skip to content

Chemical Equilibrium

A reversible reaction reaches dynamic equilibrium when the rate of the forward reaction equals the rate of the reverse reaction. At equilibrium:

  • The macroscopic properties (concentration, pressure, colour) are constant.
  • Microscopically, both forward and reverse reactions continue to occur at equal rates.
  • The position of equilibrium describes the relative amounts of reactants and products.

Dynamic equilibrium is only established in a closed system — one in which no matter can enter or leave.

If a system at equilibrium is subjected to a change in conditions, the equilibrium position shifts to counteract the imposed change.

ChangeEffect on equilibrium positionEffect on KK
Increase concentration of reactantShifts to products (right)No change
Increase pressure (fewer moles gas on right)Shifts to fewer gas molesNo change
Increase temperature (endothermic forward)Shifts in endothermic directionChanges
Add catalystNo shift (speeds both equally)No change

Critical distinction: Le Chatelier’s principle predicts the direction of the equilibrium shift but does not change the value of the equilibrium constant (except for temperature changes).

For a general reaction:

AA+bB⇌cC+dDA\mathrm{A} + b\mathrm{B} \rightleftharpoons c\mathrm{C} + d\mathrm{D}

The equilibrium constant in terms of concentrations is:

Kc=[C]c[D]d[A]a[B]bK_c = \frac{[\mathrm{C}]^c[\mathrm{D}]^d}{[\mathrm{A}]^a[\mathrm{B}]^b}

Where all concentrations are equilibrium concentrations in mol/dm3\mathrm{mol/dm}^3.

The units depend on the stoichiometry:

UnitsofKc=(mol/dm3)(c+d)−(a+b)\mathrm{Units of } K_c = (\mathrm{mol/dm}^3)^{(c+d)-(a+b)}

If (c+d)=(a+b)(c+d) = (a+b), KcK_c is dimensionless.

ReactionUnits of KcK_c
A⇌B\mathrm{A} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{B} (1:1)No units
A⇌2B\mathrm{A} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{B} (1:2)mol/dm3\mathrm{mol/dm}^3
A+B⇌C+D\mathrm{A} + \mathrm{B} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{C} + \mathrm{D} (1:1:1:1)No units
N2+3H2⇌2NH3\mathrm{N}_2 + 3\mathrm{H}_2 \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3mol−2 dm6\mathrm{mol^{-2}\,dm^6}

1.00 mol1.00\,\mathrm{mol} of H2\mathrm{H}_2 and 1.00 mol1.00\,\mathrm{mol} of I2\mathrm{I}_2 are placed in a 1.00 dm31.00\,\mathrm{dm}^3 vessel at 718 K718\,\mathrm{K}. At equilibrium, 0.78 mol0.78\,\mathrm{mol} of HI\mathrm{HI} has formed.

H2(g)+I2(g)⇌2HI(g)\mathrm{H}_2(g) + \mathrm{I}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{HI}(g)
SpeciesInitial (mol)Change (mol)Equilibrium (mol)Equilibrium (mol/dm3\mathrm{mol/dm}^3)
H2\mathrm{H}_21.00−0.39-0.390.610.61
I2\mathrm{I}_21.00−0.39-0.390.610.61
HI\mathrm{HI}0+0.78+0.780.780.78
Kc=[HI]2[H2][I2]=(0.78)2(0.61)(0.61)=0.60840.3721=1.64K_c = \frac{[\mathrm{HI}]^2}{[\mathrm{H}_2][\mathrm{I}_2]} = \frac{(0.78)^2}{(0.61)(0.61)} = \frac{0.6084}{0.3721} = 1.64

KcK_c is dimensionless here because (c+d)−(a+b)=2−2=0(c+d)-(a+b) = 2 - 2 = 0.

For gaseous reactions, KpK_p is expressed in terms of partial pressures:

Kp=(pC)c(pD)d(pA)a(pB)bK_p = \frac{(p_\mathrm{C})^c(p_\mathrm{D})^d}{(p_\mathrm{A})^a(p_\mathrm{B})^b}

Where pip_i is the equilibrium partial pressure of species ii.

The partial pressure of a gas in a mixture is the pressure that gas would exert if it occupied the entire volume alone:

Pi=xi×ptotalP_i = x_i \times p_\mathrm{total}

Where xi=ni/ntotalx_i = n_i / n_\mathrm{total} is the mole fraction of gas ii.

The units depend on the stoichiometry. If Δng=(c+d)−(a+b)\Delta n_g = (c+d) - (a+b) is the change in the number of moles of gas:

  • Δng=0\Delta n_g = 0: KpK_p is dimensionless.
  • Δng=1\Delta n_g = 1: units of pressure (atm\mathrm{atm}, kPa\mathrm{kPa} Etc.).
  • Δng=−2\Delta n_g = -2: units of pressure−2\mathrm{pressure}^{-2}.

Note: The numerical value of KpK_p depends on the units of pressure used. Always state the pressure units.

2.00 mol2.00\,\mathrm{mol} of SO2\mathrm{SO}_2 and 1.00 mol1.00\,\mathrm{mol} of O2\mathrm{O}_2 are placed in a 10.0 dm310.0\,\mathrm{dm}^3 vessel at 1000 K1000\,\mathrm{K}. At equilibrium, 1.20 mol1.20\,\mathrm{mol} of SO3\mathrm{SO}_3 has formed. Total pressure = 200 kPa200\,\mathrm{kPa}.

2SO2(g)+O2(g)⇌2SO3(g)2\mathrm{SO}_2(g) + \mathrm{O}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{SO}_3(g)
SpeciesInitial (mol)Change (mol)Equilibrium (mol)
SO2\mathrm{SO}_22.00−1.20-1.200.80
O2\mathrm{O}_21.00−0.60-0.600.40
SO3\mathrm{SO}_30+1.20+1.201.20

ntotal=0.80+0.40+1.20=2.40 moln_\mathrm{total} = 0.80 + 0.40 + 1.20 = 2.40\,\mathrm{mol}

Mole fractions: x(\mathrm{SO}_2) = 0.80/2.40 = 0.333$$x(\mathrm{O}_2) = 0.40/2.40 = 0.167$$x(\mathrm{SO}_3) = 1.20/2.40 = 0.500.

Partial pressures (pi=xi×200p_i = x_i \times 200):

  • p(SO2)=66.7 kPap(\mathrm{SO}_2) = 66.7\,\mathrm{kPa}
  • p(O2)=33.3 kPap(\mathrm{O}_2) = 33.3\,\mathrm{kPa}
  • p(SO3)=100.0 kPap(\mathrm{SO}_3) = 100.0\,\mathrm{kPa}
Kp=(pSO3)2(pSO2)2×pO2=(100.0)2(66.7)2×33.3=10000148074=0.0675 kPa−1K_p = \frac{(p_{\mathrm{SO}_3})^2}{(p_{\mathrm{SO}_2})^2 \times p_{\mathrm{O}_2}} = \frac{(100.0)^2}{(66.7)^2 \times 33.3} = \frac{10000}{148074} = 0.0675\,\mathrm{kPa}^{-1}

Homogeneous equilibrium: all species are in the same phase. Both KcK_c and KpK_p apply.

Heterogeneous equilibrium: species exist in more than one phase. Pure solids and pure liquids have constant concentration and are omitted from the equilibrium expression.

Example: CaCO3(s)⇌CaO(s)+CO2(g)\mathrm{CaCO}_3(s) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CaO}(s) + \mathrm{CO}_2(g)

Kp=p(CO2)K_p = p(\mathrm{CO}_2)

The concentrations of CaCO3(s)\mathrm{CaCO}_3(s) and CaO(s)\mathrm{CaO}(s) are constants (they are pure solids) and are absorbed into KK.

Changing temperature does change KK. For an exothermic reaction (ΔH<0\Delta H \lt 0):

  • Increasing temperature shifts equilibrium to the left (endothermic direction).
  • KK decreases.

For an endothermic reaction (ΔH>0\Delta H \gt 0):

  • Increasing temperature shifts equilibrium to the right.
  • KK increases.

The quantitative relationship is given by the van ‘t Hoff equation:

ln⁡(K2K1)=−ΔH∘R(1T2−1T1)\ln\left(\frac{K_2}{K_1}\right) = -\frac{\Delta H^\circ}{R}\left(\frac{1}{T_2} - \frac{1}{T_1}\right)

This is analogous to the Arrhenius equation (see Chemical Kinetics).

Worked Example. For the reaction \mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NO}_2(g)$$\Delta H^\circ = +58.0\,\mathrm{kJ/mol} and Kp=0.115K_p = 0.115 at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K}. Calculate KpK_p at 350 K350\,\mathrm{K}.

ln⁡(K20.115)=−580008.314(1350−1298)\ln\left(\frac{K_2}{0.115}\right) = -\frac{58000}{8.314}\left(\frac{1}{350} - \frac{1}{298}\right) ln⁡(K20.115)=−6977×(0.002857−0.003356)=−6977×(−4.99×10−4)=+3.48\ln\left(\frac{K_2}{0.115}\right) = -6977 \times (0.002857 - 0.003356) = -6977 \times (-4.99 \times 10^{-4}) = +3.48 K20.115=e3.48=32.5\frac{K_2}{0.115} = e^{3.48} = 32.5 K2=32.5×0.115=3.73K_2 = 32.5 \times 0.115 = 3.73

KpK_p increases significantly with temperature, consistent with the endothermic forward reaction being favoured at higher temperature.

Relationship Between KcK_c and KpK_p

Section titled “Relationship Between KcK_cKc​ and KpK_pKp​”

For gas-phase reactions, KcK_c and KpK_p are related by:

Kp=Kc(RT)ΔngK_p = K_c(RT)^{\Delta n_g}

Where Δng\Delta n_g is the change in the number of moles of gas (products minus reactants).

Worked Example. For N2(g)+3H2(g)⇌2NH3(g)\mathrm{N}_2(g) + 3\mathrm{H}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3(g) at 500\,\mathrm{K}$$K_c = 6.0 \times 10^{-2}\,\mathrm{mol^{-2}\,dm^6}. Calculate KpK_p.

Δng=2−(1+3)=−2\Delta n_g = 2 - (1 + 3) = -2.

Kp=Kc(RT)−2=Kc(RT)2=6.0×10−2(8.314×500)2=0.060(4157)2=0.0601.728×107=3.5×10−9 Pa−2K_p = K_c(RT)^{-2} = \frac{K_c}{(RT)^2} = \frac{6.0 \times 10^{-2}}{(8.314 \times 500)^2} = \frac{0.060}{(4157)^2} = \frac{0.060}{1.728 \times 10^7} = 3.5 \times 10^{-9}\,\mathrm{Pa^{-2}}

Note: if KcK_c is in \mathrm{mol/dm^3}$$R must be in consistent units. Alternatively, work in atm\mathrm{atm}: R=0.0821 dm3 atm mol−1 K−1R = 0.0821\,\mathrm{dm^3\,atm\,mol^{-1}\,K^{-1}}.

Kp=0.060(0.0821×500)2=0.060(41.05)2=0.0601685=3.6×10−5 atm−2K_p = \frac{0.060}{(0.0821 \times 500)^2} = \frac{0.060}{(41.05)^2} = \frac{0.060}{1685} = 3.6 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{atm^{-2}}

Always state the pressure units when giving KpK_p.

Changing concentrations or partial pressures shifts the equilibrium position but does not change KK (at constant temperature). The system re-equilibrates such that the ratio of products to reactants returns to the same KK value.

A catalyst increases the rate at which equilibrium is established but does not change the equilibrium position or the value of KK.

N2(g)+3H2(g)⇌2NH3(g)ΔH=−92 kJ/mol\mathrm{N}_2(g) + 3\mathrm{H}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3(g) \quad \Delta H = -92\,\mathrm{kJ/mol}
ConditionEffect on equilibriumEffect on rateCompromise
High pressure (200 atm)Favours products (fewer moles)Increases rateExpensive equipment
Moderate temperature (450 ∘^\circ C)Low temperature favours productsLow temperature slows rate450 ∘^\circ C is optimal
Iron catalystNo effect on positionIncreases rateCheap, effective
Removal of NH3\mathrm{NH}_3Shifts equilibrium right—Continuous removal
2SO2(g)+O2(g)⇌2SO3(g)ΔH=−197 kJ/mol2\mathrm{SO}_2(g) + \mathrm{O}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{SO}_3(g) \quad \Delta H = -197\,\mathrm{kJ/mol}
  • Temperature: 400—450 ∘^\circ C (compromise between equilibrium and rate).
  • Pressure: 1—2 atm (since KK is already large at this temperature, high pressure is not essential).
  • Catalyst: V2O5\mathrm{V}_2\mathrm{O}_5.

For a sparingly soluble salt MaXb\mathrm{M}_a\mathrm{X}_b:

MaXb(s)⇌aMb+(aq)+bXa−(aq)\mathrm{M}_a\mathrm{X}_b(s) \rightleftharpoons a\mathrm{M}^{b+}(aq) + b\mathrm{X}^{a-}(aq) Ksp=[Mb+]a[Xa−]bK_{sp} = [\mathrm{M}^{b+}]^a[\mathrm{X}^{a-}]^b

KspK_{sp} is the equilibrium constant for the dissolution of a solid. It applies only to sparingly soluble salts — highly soluble salts have concentrations far above those described by equilibrium considerations.

SaltKspK_{sp}Expression
AgCl\mathrm{AgCl}1.8×10−101.8 \times 10^{-10}[Ag+][Cl−][\mathrm{Ag}^+][\mathrm{Cl}^-]
PbI2\mathrm{PbI}_21.4×10−81.4 \times 10^{-8}[Pb2+][I−]2[\mathrm{Pb}^{2+}][\mathrm{I}^-]^2
BaSO4\mathrm{BaSO}_41.1×10−101.1 \times 10^{-10}[Ba2+][SO42−][\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}][\mathrm{SO}_4^{2-}]
Ca(OH)2\mathrm{Ca(OH)}_25.5×10−65.5 \times 10^{-6}[Ca2+][OH−]2[\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}][\mathrm{OH}^-]^2

Calculate the solubility of PbI2\mathrm{PbI}_2 in mol/dm3\mathrm{mol/dm}^3.

PbI2(s)⇌Pb2+(aq)+2I−(aq)\mathrm{PbI}_2(s) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Pb}^{2+}(aq) + 2\mathrm{I}^-(aq)

Let ss = solubility in mol/dm3\mathrm{mol/dm}^3. At equilibrium: [\mathrm{Pb}^{2+}] = s$$[\mathrm{I}^-] = 2s.

Ksp=[Pb2+][I−]2=s(2s)2=4s3K_{sp} = [\mathrm{Pb}^{2+}][\mathrm{I}^-]^2 = s(2s)^2 = 4s^3 S=Ksp43=1.4×10−843=3.5×10−93=1.52×10−3 mol/dm3S = \sqrt[3]{\frac{K_{sp}}{4}} = \sqrt[3]{\frac{1.4 \times 10^{-8}}{4}} = \sqrt[3]{3.5 \times 10^{-9}} = 1.52 \times 10^{-3}\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3

Compare the ion product (QQ) with KspK_{sp}:

  • Q<KspQ \lt K_{sp}: solution is unsaturated; no precipitate.
  • Q=KspQ = K_{sp}: solution is saturated; at equilibrium.
  • Q>KspQ \gt K_{sp}: solution is supersaturated; precipitation occurs.

The solubility of a salt is reduced when a common ion is already present in solution. The additional common ion shifts the dissolution equilibrium to the left, suppressing dissolution.

Example. The solubility of AgCl\mathrm{AgCl} in pure water is:

S=Ksp=1.8×10−10=1.34×10−5 mol/dm3S = \sqrt{K_{sp}} = \sqrt{1.8 \times 10^{-10}} = 1.34 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3

In 0.10 mol/dm30.10\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3 NaCl\mathrm{NaCl} solution:

[Ag+]=Ksp[Cl−]=1.8×10−100.10=1.8×10−9 mol/dm3[\mathrm{Ag}^+] = \frac{K_{sp}}{[\mathrm{Cl}^-]} = \frac{1.8 \times 10^{-10}}{0.10} = 1.8 \times 10^{-9}\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3

The solubility is reduced by a factor of approximately 10410^4.

  1. Including solids and liquids in KcK_c expressions. Pure solids and pure liquids are omitted because their activities are constant and incorporated into KK.

  2. Confusing KcK_c and KpK_p. KcK_c uses concentrations; KpK_p uses partial pressures. They are numerically different for gas-phase reactions.

  3. Incorrectly applying Le Chatelier to catalysts. A catalyst speeds up both forward and reverse reactions equally; it does not shift the equilibrium position.

  4. Ignoring the exponent in KspK_{sp} expressions. For PbI2\mathrm{PbI}_2 The iodide concentration is squared in the KspK_{sp} expression, leading to a factor of 4 in the solubility calculation.

  5. Reversing KK incorrectly. If a reaction is reversed, Knew=1/KoriginalK_\mathrm{new} = 1/K_\mathrm{original}. If the stoichiometry is multiplied by n$$K_\mathrm{new} = K_\mathrm{original}^n.

  6. Using concentration units incorrectly in KpK_p. KpK_p uses partial pressures (atm, Pa, or bar). Partial pressure pi=xi×ptotalp_i = x_i \times p_\mathrm{total} Where xix_i is the mole fraction.

  7. Assuming that changing the amount of a solid affects the equilibrium. Changing the amount of a pure solid or liquid has no effect on the equilibrium position because its activity is constant.

The Relationship Between KcK_c and KpK_p

Section titled “The Relationship Between KcK_cKc​ and KpK_pKp​”

For a gas-phase reaction:

AA(g)+bB(g)⇌cC(g)+dD(g)A\mathrm{A}(g) + b\mathrm{B}(g) \rightleftharpoons c\mathrm{C}(g) + d\mathrm{D}(g)

The relationship between KpK_p and KcK_c is:

Kp=Kc(RT)ΔnK_p = K_c(RT)^{\Delta n}

Where Δn=(c+d)−(a+b)\Delta n = (c + d) - (a + b) is the change in the number of moles of gas, R=8.314 J mol−1 K−1R = 8.314\,\mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}\,K^{-1}} And TT is in Kelvin.

Important: When Δn=0\Delta n = 0 (equal moles of gas on both sides), Kp=KcK_p = K_c.

Worked Example. For N2(g)+3H2(g)⇌2NH3(g)\mathrm{N}_2(g) + 3\mathrm{H}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3(g) at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K}:

Δn=2−(1+3)=−2\Delta n = 2 - (1 + 3) = -2 Kp=Kc(RT)−2=Kc(RT)2K_p = K_c(RT)^{-2} = \frac{K_c}{(RT)^2}

The units of KpK_p and KcK_c differ when Δn≠0\Delta n \neq 0. Always check units carefully.

A related concept to equilibrium constants is the partition coefficient, which describes the distribution of a solute between two immiscible solvents:

Kpartition=[solute]organic[solute]aqueousK_\mathrm{partition} = \frac{[\text{solute}]_\mathrm{organic}}{[\text{solute}]_\mathrm{aqueous}}

This is constant at a given temperature and is used in solvent extraction. If a solute is more soluble in the organic phase, Kpartition>1K_\mathrm{partition} \gt 1 And extraction with an organic solvent is efficient.

100 cm3100\,\mathrm{cm}^3 of an aqueous solution contains 5.0 g5.0\,\mathrm{g} of an organic compound. The partition coefficient between diethyl ether and water is 4.0. Calculate how much of the compound is extracted by:

(a) One extraction with 100 cm3100\,\mathrm{cm}^3 of ether.

(b) Two extractions with 50 cm350\,\mathrm{cm}^3 of ether each.

(a) K=cethercwater=4.0K = \frac{c_\mathrm{ether}}{c_\mathrm{water}} = 4.0

Let xx = mass extracted. c_\mathrm{ether} = x/100$$c_\mathrm{water} = (5.0 - x)/100.

4.0=x/100(5.0−x)/100=x5.0−x4.0 = \frac{x/100}{(5.0 - x)/100} = \frac{x}{5.0 - x} 4(5.0−x)=x  ⟹  20−4x=x  ⟹  x=4.0 g4(5.0 - x) = x \implies 20 - 4x = x \implies x = 4.0\,\mathrm{g}

(b) First extraction with 50 cm350\,\mathrm{cm}^3: Let x1x_1 = mass extracted.

4.0=x1/50(5.0−x1)/100=2x15.0−x14.0 = \frac{x_1/50}{(5.0 - x_1)/100} = \frac{2x_1}{5.0 - x_1} 4(5.0−x1)=2x1  ⟹  20−4x1=2x1  ⟹  x1=3.33 g4(5.0 - x_1) = 2x_1 \implies 20 - 4x_1 = 2x_1 \implies x_1 = 3.33\,\mathrm{g}

Remaining: 5.0−3.33=1.67 g5.0 - 3.33 = 1.67\,\mathrm{g}.

Second extraction with 50 cm350\,\mathrm{cm}^3: Let x2x_2 = mass extracted.

4.0=x2/50(1.67−x2)/100=2x21.67−x24.0 = \frac{x_2/50}{(1.67 - x_2)/100} = \frac{2x_2}{1.67 - x_2} 4(1.67−x2)=2x2  ⟹  x2=1.11 g4(1.67 - x_2) = 2x_2 \implies x_2 = 1.11\,\mathrm{g}

Total extracted: 3.33+1.11=4.44 g3.33 + 1.11 = 4.44\,\mathrm{g}.

Two extractions with half the volume each extract more (4.44 g4.44\,\mathrm{g}) than one extraction with the full volume (4.0 g4.0\,\mathrm{g}). Multiple extractions are always more efficient than a single extraction of the same total volume.

The equilibrium constant for the dissociation of a weak acid is the acid dissociation constant, KaK_a. The relationship between KaK_a and KbK_b for a conjugate acid-base pair at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K} is:

Ka×Kb=Kw=1.0×10−14K_a \times K_b = K_w = 1.0 \times 10^{-14}

This is a specific application of the general principle that Kforward×Kreverse=1K_\mathrm{forward} \times K_\mathrm{reverse} = 1 for a pair of conjugate reactions. See Acids, Bases and Buffers for the full treatment.

Problem 1

At 700 K700\,\mathrm{K} The equilibrium H2(g)+I2(g)⇌2HI(g)\mathrm{H}_2(g) + \mathrm{I}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{HI}(g) has Kc=50.0K_c = 50.0. If 0.200 mol0.200\,\mathrm{mol} of H2\mathrm{H}_2 and 0.200 mol0.200\,\mathrm{mol} of I2\mathrm{I}_2 are placed in a 5.00 dm35.00\,\mathrm{dm}^3 vessel, calculate the equilibrium concentrations.

Solution:

Initial concentrations: [\mathrm{H}_2] = [\mathrm{I}_2] = 0.200/5.00 = 0.0400\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3$$[\mathrm{HI}] = 0.

Let xx = concentration of H2\mathrm{H}_2 reacted.

At equilibrium: [\mathrm{H}_2] = 0.0400 - x$$[\mathrm{I}_2] = 0.0400 - x$$[\mathrm{HI}] = 2x.

Kc=(2x)2(0.0400−x)2=50.0K_c = \frac{(2x)^2}{(0.0400 - x)^2} = 50.0 2x0.0400−x=50.0=7.07\frac{2x}{0.0400 - x} = \sqrt{50.0} = 7.07 2x=7.07(0.0400−x)=0.283−7.07x2x = 7.07(0.0400 - x) = 0.283 - 7.07x 9.07x=0.2839.07x = 0.283 X=0.0312 mol/dm3X = 0.0312\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3

[\mathrm{H}_2] = [\mathrm{I}_2] = 0.0088\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3$$[\mathrm{HI}] = 0.0624\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3.

Problem 2

Will a precipitate form when 10.0 cm310.0\,\mathrm{cm}^3 of 0.010 mol/dm30.010\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3 AgNO3\mathrm{AgNO}_3 is added to 40.0 cm340.0\,\mathrm{cm}^3 of 0.0050 mol/dm30.0050\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3 NaCl\mathrm{NaCl}? (Ksp(AgCl)=1.8×10−10K_{sp}(\mathrm{AgCl}) = 1.8 \times 10^{-10})

Solution:

Total volume = 50.0 cm350.0\,\mathrm{cm}^3.

[Ag+]=0.010×10.050.0=0.0020 mol/dm3[\mathrm{Ag}^+] = \frac{0.010 \times 10.0}{50.0} = 0.0020\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3

[Cl−]=0.0050×40.050.0=0.0040 mol/dm3[\mathrm{Cl}^-] = \frac{0.0050 \times 40.0}{50.0} = 0.0040\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3

Q=[Ag+][Cl−]=0.0020×0.0040=8.0×10−6Q = [\mathrm{Ag}^+][\mathrm{Cl}^-] = 0.0020 \times 0.0040 = 8.0 \times 10^{-6}

Since Q=8.0×10−6>Ksp=1.8×10−10Q = 8.0 \times 10^{-6} \gt K_{sp} = 1.8 \times 10^{-10} A precipitate of AgCl\mathrm{AgCl} will form.

Problem 3

At 298 K298\,\mathrm{K} The equilibrium PCl5(g)⇌PCl3(g)+Cl2(g)\mathrm{PCl}_5(g) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{PCl}_3(g) + \mathrm{Cl}_2(g) has Kp=12.5 kPaK_p = 12.5\,\mathrm{kPa}. A sample of PCl5\mathrm{PCl}_5 is placed in a sealed vessel at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K}. At equilibrium, the total pressure is 200 kPa200\,\mathrm{kPa} and the partial pressure of Cl2\mathrm{Cl}_2 is 95 kPa95\,\mathrm{kPa}. Calculate the partial pressures of PCl5\mathrm{PCl}_5 and PCl3\mathrm{PCl}_3 at equilibrium and verify that they satisfy KpK_p.

Solution:

At equilibrium: p(Cl2)=95 kPap(\mathrm{Cl}_2) = 95\,\mathrm{kPa}.

From the stoichiometry, p(PCl3)=p(Cl2)=95 kPap(\mathrm{PCl}_3) = p(\mathrm{Cl}_2) = 95\,\mathrm{kPa} (1:1 ratio).

Total pressure: p(PCl5)+p(PCl3)+p(Cl2)=200 kPap(\mathrm{PCl}_5) + p(\mathrm{PCl}_3) + p(\mathrm{Cl}_2) = 200\,\mathrm{kPa}

P(PCl5)=200−95−95=10 kPaP(\mathrm{PCl}_5) = 200 - 95 - 95 = 10\,\mathrm{kPa}

Verification:

Kp=p(PCl3)×p(Cl2)p(PCl5)=95×9510=902510=902.5 kPaK_p = \frac{p(\mathrm{PCl}_3) \times p(\mathrm{Cl}_2)}{p(\mathrm{PCl}_5)} = \frac{95 \times 95}{10} = \frac{9025}{10} = 902.5\,\mathrm{kPa}

This does not equal Kp=12.5 kPaK_p = 12.5\,\mathrm{kPa} Indicating that the given data is inconsistent with Kp=12.5 kPaK_p = 12.5\,\mathrm{kPa}. Either the total pressure or the Cl2\mathrm{Cl}_2 partial pressure is incorrect for the stated KpK_p.

Let us instead use Kp=12.5 kPaK_p = 12.5\,\mathrm{kPa} and total pressure =200 kPa= 200\,\mathrm{kPa} to find the correct partial pressures.

Let x=p(PCl5)x = p(\mathrm{PCl}_5) at equilibrium. Then p(PCl3)=p(Cl2)=200−xp(\mathrm{PCl}_3) = p(\mathrm{Cl}_2) = 200 - x (since they are equal).

Kp=(200−x)2x=12.5K_p = \frac{(200 - x)^2}{x} = 12.5 (200−x)2=12.5x(200 - x)^2 = 12.5x 40000−400x+x2=12.5x40000 - 400x + x^2 = 12.5x X2−412.5x+40000=0X^2 - 412.5x + 40000 = 0

Using the quadratic formula:

X=412.5±412.52−4×400002=412.5±170156−1600002=412.5±101562=412.5±100.82X = \frac{412.5 \pm \sqrt{412.5^2 - 4 \times 40000}}{2} = \frac{412.5 \pm \sqrt{170156 - 160000}}{2} = \frac{412.5 \pm \sqrt{10156}}{2} = \frac{412.5 \pm 100.8}{2}

x=256.7x = 256.7 or x=155.9x = 155.9. Since p(PCl3)=200−xp(\mathrm{PCl}_3) = 200 - x must be positive, x=155.9 kPax = 155.9\,\mathrm{kPa}.

p(\mathrm{PCl}_5) = 155.9\,\mathrm{kPa}$$p(\mathrm{PCl}_3) = p(\mathrm{Cl}_2) = 44.1\,\mathrm{kPa}.

Check: Kp=(44.1)2/155.9=1945/155.9=12.5 kPaK_p = (44.1)^2 / 155.9 = 1945 / 155.9 = 12.5\,\mathrm{kPa}. Correct.

Problem 4

The common ion effect: Calculate the solubility of CaF2\mathrm{CaF}_2 in (a) pure water and (b) 0.050 mol/dm30.050\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3 CaCl2\mathrm{CaCl}_2 solution. Ksp(CaF2)=3.9×10−11K_{sp}(\mathrm{CaF}_2) = 3.9 \times 10^{-11}.

Solution:

(a) In pure water: CaF2(s)⇌Ca2+(aq)+2F−(aq)\mathrm{CaF}_2(s) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Ca}^{2+}(aq) + 2\mathrm{F}^-(aq)

Let ss = solubility. [\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}] = s$$[\mathrm{F}^-] = 2s.

Ksp=s(2s)2=4s3=3.9×10−11K_{sp} = s(2s)^2 = 4s^3 = 3.9 \times 10^{-11} S=3.9×10−1143=9.75×10−123=2.14×10−4 mol/dm3S = \sqrt[3]{\frac{3.9 \times 10^{-11}}{4}} = \sqrt[3]{9.75 \times 10^{-12}} = 2.14 \times 10^{-4}\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3

(b) In 0.050 mol/dm30.050\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3 CaCl2\mathrm{CaCl}_2: [Ca2+]from CaCl2=0.050 mol/dm3[\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}]_\mathrm{from\ CaCl_2} = 0.050\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3.

Ksp=[Ca2+]total[F−]2=(0.050+s)(2s)2≈0.050×4s2K_{sp} = [\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}]_\mathrm{total}[\mathrm{F}^-]^2 = (0.050 + s)(2s)^2 \approx 0.050 \times 4s^2

(The approximation 0.050+s≈0.0500.050 + s \approx 0.050 is valid because ss will be very small compared to 0.0500.050.)

0.200s2=3.9×10−110.200s^2 = 3.9 \times 10^{-11} S2=1.95×10−10S^2 = 1.95 \times 10^{-10} S=1.40×10−5 mol/dm3S = 1.40 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3

The solubility in 0.050 mol/dm30.050\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3 CaCl2\mathrm{CaCl}_2 (1.40×10−5 mol/dm31.40 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3) is approximately 15 times less than in pure water (2.14×10−4 mol/dm32.14 \times 10^{-4}\,\mathrm{mol/dm}^3). The common ion (Ca2+\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}) suppresses the dissolution of CaF2\mathrm{CaF}_2.

Problem 5

The equilibrium N2O4(g)⇌2NO2(g)\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NO}_2(g) has ΔH=+58 kJ/mol\Delta H = +58\,\mathrm{kJ/mol} and Kp=0.115 atmK_p = 0.115\,\mathrm{atm} at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K}.

(a) If the total pressure is increased, predict the effect on the equilibrium position. (b) If the temperature is increased to 350 K350\,\mathrm{K} Predict whether KpK_p increases or decreases, and explain. (c) 1.00 mol1.00\,\mathrm{mol} of N2O4\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4 is placed in a 10.0 dm310.0\,\mathrm{dm}^3 vessel at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K}. Calculate the equilibrium partial pressures of both gases.

Solution:

(a) Increasing total pressure favours the side with fewer moles of gas. Here, 1 mole of N2O4\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4 produces 2 moles of NO2\mathrm{NO}_2 So increasing pressure shifts equilibrium to the left (favouring N2O4\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4).

(b) The forward reaction is endothermic (ΔH>0\Delta H > 0). Increasing temperature shifts equilibrium to the right (endothermic direction), so KpK_p increases. This is consistent with the van ‘t Hoff equation: ln⁡(K2/K1)=−(ΔH/R)(1/T2−1/T1)\ln(K_2/K_1) = -(\Delta H/R)(1/T_2 - 1/T_1).

(c) Let xx = moles of N2O4\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4 dissociated.

At equilibrium: n(\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4) = 1.00 - x$$n(\mathrm{NO}_2) = 2x Total moles =1.00+x= 1.00 + x.

Total pressure: use pV=nRTpV = nRT:

Ptotal=(1.00+x)RTV=(1.00+x)×8.314×29810.0×10−3=(1.00+x)×247 700 PaP_\mathrm{total} = \frac{(1.00 + x)RT}{V} = \frac{(1.00 + x) \times 8.314 \times 298}{10.0 \times 10^{-3}} = (1.00 + x) \times 247\,700\,\mathrm{Pa}

Partial pressures: p(\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4) = \frac{1.00 - x}{1.00 + x} \times p_\mathrm{total}$$p(\mathrm{NO}_2) = \frac{2x}{1.00 + x} \times p_\mathrm{total}.

Kp=p(NO2)2p(N2O4)=(2x)2(1.00−x)(1.00+x)×ptotal=4x21−x2×ptotalK_p = \frac{p(\mathrm{NO}_2)^2}{p(\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4)} = \frac{(2x)^2}{(1.00 - x)(1.00 + x)} \times p_\mathrm{total} = \frac{4x^2}{1 - x^2} \times p_\mathrm{total}

Since Kp=0.115 atm=0.115×101325=11652 PaK_p = 0.115\,\mathrm{atm} = 0.115 \times 101325 = 11652\,\mathrm{Pa}:

11652=4x21−x2×247700(1+x)11652 = \frac{4x^2}{1 - x^2} \times 247700(1 + x)

This requires iterative solution or approximation. Assuming x≪1x \ll 1:

11652≈4x2×24770011652 \approx 4x^2 \times 247700 X2≈11652990800=0.01176X^2 \approx \frac{11652}{990800} = 0.01176 X≈0.108 molX \approx 0.108\,\mathrm{mol}

n(\mathrm{NO}_2) = 2 \times 0.108 = 0.217\,\mathrm{mol}$$n(\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4) = 0.892\,\mathrm{mol}.

p(NO2)=0.2171.108×247700(1.108)=0.217×247700=53751 Pa=0.531 atmp(\mathrm{NO}_2) = \frac{0.217}{1.108} \times 247700(1.108) = 0.217 \times 247700 = 53751\,\mathrm{Pa} = 0.531\,\mathrm{atm}

p(N2O4)=0.892×247700=220948 Pa=2.18 atmp(\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4) = 0.892 \times 247700 = 220948\,\mathrm{Pa} = 2.18\,\mathrm{atm}

Verify: Kp=(0.531)2/2.18=0.282/2.18=0.129 atmK_p = (0.531)^2 / 2.18 = 0.282/2.18 = 0.129\,\mathrm{atm} (close to 0.1150.115 The discrepancy is due to the approximation).

Le Chatelier’s Principle: Quantitative Treatment

Section titled “Le Chatelier’s Principle: Quantitative Treatment”

Le Chatelier’s principle can be treated quantitatively using the equilibrium constant. When a change is made to a system at equilibrium, the system responds in a way that partially counteracts the change.

Worked Example: For the equilibrium N2O4(g)⇌2NO2(g)\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NO}_2(g) with Kp=0.115 atmK_p = 0.115\,\mathrm{atm} at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K} What is the effect of doubling the total pressure by halving the volume?

Initially, let p(N2O4)=1.00 atmp(\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4) = 1.00\,\mathrm{atm} and p(NO2)=0.339 atmp(\mathrm{NO}_2) = 0.339\,\mathrm{atm} (satisfying Kp=(0.339)2/1.00=0.115K_p = (0.339)^2/1.00 = 0.115).

When the volume is halved, all partial pressures double instantly: p(\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4) = 2.00\,\mathrm{atm}$$p(\mathrm{NO}_2) = 0.678\,\mathrm{atm}.

The reaction quotient: Qp=(0.678)2/2.00=0.230>KpQ_p = (0.678)^2 / 2.00 = 0.230 > K_p.

Since Qp>KpQ_p > K_p The system shifts to the left (fewer moles of gas) to reduce QpQ_p back towards KpK_p. This is consistent with Le Chatelier’s principle: increasing pressure favours the side with fewer gas molecules.

Worked Example: Effect of temperature on equilibrium composition.

For \mathrm{N}_2(g) + 3\mathrm{H}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3(g)$$\Delta H = -92\,\mathrm{kJ/mol}.

At 400∘C400^\circ\mathrm{C}: Kp=6.2×10−4 atm−2K_p = 6.2 \times 10^{-4}\,\mathrm{atm}^{-2}. At 500∘C500^\circ\mathrm{C}: Kp=4.5×10−6 atm−2K_p = 4.5 \times 10^{-6}\,\mathrm{atm}^{-2}.

The equilibrium constant decreases with increasing temperature because the forward reaction is exothermic. According to Le Chatelier’s principle, increasing temperature favours the endothermic (reverse) direction, reducing the ammonia yield. This is confirmed quantitatively by the decrease in KpK_p.

The relationship between KK and temperature is given by the van ‘t Hoff equation:

ln⁡K2K1=−ΔH∘R(1T2−1T1)\ln\frac{K_2}{K_1} = -\frac{\Delta H^\circ}{R}\left(\frac{1}{T_2} - \frac{1}{T_1}\right)

Heterogeneous equilibria involve substances in more than one phase. The concentrations of pure solids and pure liquids are constant and are incorporated into the equilibrium constant, so they do not appear in the KcK_c or KpK_p expression.

Example: CaCO3(s)⇌CaO(s)+CO2(g)\mathrm{CaCO}_3(s) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CaO}(s) + \mathrm{CO}_2(g)

Kp=p(CO2)K_p = p(\mathrm{CO}_2)

At 900^\circ\mathrm{C}$$K_p = 1.04\,\mathrm{atm}. This means that in a closed container, CaCO3\mathrm{CaCO}_3 decomposes until the partial pressure of CO2\mathrm{CO}_2 reaches 1.04 atm1.04\,\mathrm{atm} At which point equilibrium is established.

Industrial Application: Haber Process Equilibrium Analysis

Section titled “Industrial Application: Haber Process Equilibrium Analysis”

Reaction: \mathrm{N}_2(g) + 3\mathrm{H}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3(g)$$\Delta H = -92\,\mathrm{kJ/mol}

ConditionEffect on equilibriumEffect on rateIndustrial choice
High pressureFavours products (4 mol →\to 2 mol)Increases rate (higher concentration)200 atm (compromise: cost vs yield)
Low temperatureFavours products (exothermic forward)Decreases rate450∘C450^\circ\mathrm{C} (compromise: yield vs rate)
Excess N2\mathrm{N}_2Shifts equilibrium rightIncreases rate of forward reactionN2:H2=1:3\mathrm{N}_2:\mathrm{H}_2 = 1:3 (stoichiometric feed)
Iron catalystNo effect on positionIncreases rate (lower EaE_a)Fe with K2O/Al2O3\mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{O}/\mathrm{Al}_2\mathrm{O}_3 promoters

The yield at 450∘C450^\circ\mathrm{C} and 200 atm is approximately 15% per pass. Unreacted N2\mathrm{N}_2 and H2\mathrm{H}_2 are recycled.

The solubility product is the equilibrium constant for the dissolution of a sparingly soluble ionic compound:

MaXb(s)⇌aMb+(aq)+bXa−(aq)\mathrm{M}_a\mathrm{X}_b(s) \rightleftharpoons a\mathrm{M}^{b+}(aq) + b\mathrm{X}^{a-}(aq) Ksp=[Mb+]a[Xa−]bK_{sp} = [\mathrm{M}^{b+}]^a[\mathrm{X}^{a-}]^b

Worked Example: Calculate the solubility of BaSO4\mathrm{BaSO}_4 in pure water. Ksp(BaSO4)=1.08×10−10 mol2 dm−6K_{sp}(\mathrm{BaSO}_4) = 1.08 \times 10^{-10}\,\mathrm{mol^2\,dm^{-6}}.

BaSO4(s)⇌Ba2+(aq)+SO42−(aq)\mathrm{BaSO}_4(s) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Ba}^{2+}(aq) + \mathrm{SO}_4^{2-}(aq)

If ss is the solubility in mol dm−3\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}}:

Ksp=s×s=s2K_{sp} = s \times s = s^2 s=Ksp=1.08×10−10=1.04×10−5 mol dm−3s = \sqrt{K_{sp}} = \sqrt{1.08 \times 10^{-10}} = 1.04 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}}

Common ion effect: The solubility of BaSO4\mathrm{BaSO}_4 is reduced in the presence of Na2SO4\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 (a common source of SO42−\mathrm{SO}_4^{2-}). Adding SO42−\mathrm{SO}_4^{2-} shifts the equilibrium to the left, precipitating more BaSO4\mathrm{BaSO}_4.

Worked Example: Will BaSO4\mathrm{BaSO}_4 precipitate when 100 cm3100\,\mathrm{cm}^3 of 0.010 mol dm−30.010\,\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}} BaCl2\mathrm{BaCl}_2 is mixed with 100 cm3100\,\mathrm{cm}^3 of 0.010 mol dm−30.010\,\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}} Na2SO4\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4?

After mixing, concentrations are halved:

[\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}] = 0.0050\,\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}}$$[\mathrm{SO}_4^{2-}] = 0.0050\,\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}}

Q=[Ba2+][SO42−]=(0.0050)2=2.5×10−5Q = [\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}][\mathrm{SO}_4^{2-}] = (0.0050)^2 = 2.5 \times 10^{-5}

Since Q=2.5×10−5≫Ksp=1.08×10−10Q = 2.5 \times 10^{-5} \gg K_{sp} = 1.08 \times 10^{-10} Precipitation will occur until [Ba2+][SO42−]=Ksp[\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}][\mathrm{SO}_4^{2-}] = K_{sp}.

Required Practical: Investigating Equilibrium (AQA RP 9)

Section titled “Required Practical: Investigating Equilibrium (AQA RP 9)”

Objective: To determine the effect of concentration on the position of equilibrium for the reaction between iron(III) ions and thiocyanate ions.

Fe3+(aq)+SCN−(aq)⇌FeSCN2+(aq)\mathrm{Fe}^{3+}(aq) + \mathrm{SCN}^-(aq) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{FeSCN}^{2+}(aq)

The FeSCN2+\mathrm{FeSCN}^{2+} ion is blood-red in colour. The intensity of the colour (measured by colorimetry) is proportional to its concentration.

Procedure:

  1. Prepare a standard solution of known [FeSCN2+][\mathrm{FeSCN}^{2+}] by using a large excess of SCN−\mathrm{SCN}^- so that essentially all Fe3+\mathrm{Fe}^{3+} is converted to FeSCN2+\mathrm{FeSCN}^{2+}.
  2. Measure the absorbance of this standard solution using a colorimeter (filter wavelength ≈470 nm\approx 470\,\mathrm{nm}).
  3. Prepare equilibrium mixtures with varying initial concentrations of Fe3+\mathrm{Fe}^{3+} and SCN−\mathrm{SCN}^-.
  4. Measure the absorbance of each equilibrium mixture.
  5. Use a calibration curve (absorbance vs [FeSCN2+][\mathrm{FeSCN}^{2+}]) to determine the equilibrium concentration of FeSCN2+\mathrm{FeSCN}^{2+} in each mixture.
  6. Calculate KcK_c for each mixture.

Exam-Style Questions with Full Mark Schemes

Section titled “Exam-Style Questions with Full Mark Schemes”
Q1 (5 marks)

Nitrogen and hydrogen react to form ammonia: N2(g)+3H2(g)⇌2NH3(g)\mathrm{N}_2(g) + 3\mathrm{H}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3(g).

At 500∘C500^\circ\mathrm{C}, Kp=6.0×10−3 atm−2K_p = 6.0 \times 10^{-3}\,\mathrm{atm}^{-2}. A mixture of 1.0 mol1.0\,\mathrm{mol} N2\mathrm{N}_2 and 3.0 mol3.0\,\mathrm{mol} H2\mathrm{H}_2 is allowed to reach equilibrium at a total pressure of 200 atm200\,\mathrm{atm}. Calculate the equilibrium mole fraction of ammonia.

Mark Scheme:

Let xx be the moles of N2\mathrm{N}_2 reacted.

Equilibrium moles: \mathrm{N}_2 = 1.0 - x$$\mathrm{H}_2 = 3.0 - 3x$$\mathrm{NH}_3 = 2x

Total moles = 4.0−2x4.0 - 2x

Mole fractions: y(\mathrm{N}_2) = \frac{1-x}{4-2x}$$y(\mathrm{H}_2) = \frac{3-3x}{4-2x}$$y(\mathrm{NH}_3) = \frac{2x}{4-2x}

Partial pressures: pi=yi×Ptotalp_i = y_i \times P_\mathrm{total}

Kp=p(NH3)2p(N2)×p(H2)3=(2x4−2x×200)2(1−x4−2x×200)(3−3x4−2x×200)3K_p = \frac{p(\mathrm{NH}_3)^2}{p(\mathrm{N}_2) \times p(\mathrm{H}_2)^3} = \frac{\left(\frac{2x}{4-2x} \times 200\right)^2}{\left(\frac{1-x}{4-2x} \times 200\right)\left(\frac{3-3x}{4-2x} \times 200\right)^3}

This simplifies to:

Kp=4x2(4−2x)2(1−x)(3−3x)3×2002K_p = \frac{4x^2(4-2x)^2}{(1-x)(3-3x)^3 \times 200^2}

Assuming xx is small (5% approximation): 4 - 2x \approx 4$$1 - x \approx 1$$3 - 3x \approx 3:

6.0×10−3=4x2×161×27×40000=64x210800006.0 \times 10^{-3} = \frac{4x^2 \times 16}{1 \times 27 \times 40000} = \frac{64x^2}{1080000} x2=6.0×10−3×108000064=648064=101.25x^2 = \frac{6.0 \times 10^{-3} \times 1080000}{64} = \frac{6480}{64} = 101.25 x≈10.1x \approx 10.1

This is inconsistent with the assumption that xx is small (it exceeds the initial moles of N2\mathrm{N}_2). This shows that at 200 atm and 500∘C500^\circ\mathrm{C} The equilibrium lies significantly towards products. A numerical or iterative solution would be required.

(1 mark for setting up the KpK_p expression, 1 mark for mole fractions, 1 mark for partial pressures, 1 mark for substitution, 1 mark for recognising the approximation issue.)

Q2 (4 marks)

For the equilibrium PCl5(g)⇌PCl3(g)+Cl2(g)\mathrm{PCl}_5(g) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{PCl}_3(g) + \mathrm{Cl}_2(g) State and explain the effect on the equilibrium position of:

(a) Increasing the pressure at constant temperature. (2 marks)

(b) Adding a catalyst. (2 marks)

Mark Scheme:

(a) Increasing pressure shifts the equilibrium to the left (towards fewer moles of gas: 1 mol vs 2 mol) (1 mark). The system partially counteracts the increase in pressure by reducing the total number of gas molecules (1 mark).

(b) A catalyst increases the rate of both forward and reverse reactions equally, so the equilibrium position is unchanged (1 mark). The catalyst provides an alternative pathway with lower activation energy but does not affect the thermodynamics (ΔG∘\Delta G^\circ and therefore KK) (1 mark).

Q3 (6 marks)

The esterification reaction: CH3COOH+CH3CH2OH⇌CH3COOCH2CH3+H2O\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH} + \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{CH}_2\mathrm{OH} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOCH}_2\mathrm{CH}_3 + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}

1.00 mol1.00\,\mathrm{mol} of ethanoic acid and 1.00 mol1.00\,\mathrm{mol} of ethanol are mixed and allowed to reach equilibrium. 0.667 mol0.667\,\mathrm{mol} of ethyl ethanoate is formed at equilibrium.

(a) Calculate the value of KcK_c. (3 marks)

(b) Calculate the percentage conversion of ethanoic acid. (1 mark)

(c) How would the equilibrium yield change if the volume of the container were halved? (2 marks)

Mark Scheme:

(a) Equilibrium moles: \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH} = 1.00 - 0.667 = 0.333\,\mathrm{mol}$$\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{CH}_2\mathrm{OH} = 0.333\,\mathrm{mol}$$\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOCH}_2\mathrm{CH}_3 = 0.667\,\mathrm{mol}$$\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} = 0.667\,\mathrm{mol}.

Since all species are in the same volume (cancels in KcK_c):

Kc=[ester][H2O][acid][alcohol]=0.667×0.6670.333×0.333=0.4450.111=4.01K_c = \frac{[\mathrm{ester}][\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}]}{[\mathrm{acid}][\mathrm{alcohol}]} = \frac{0.667 \times 0.667}{0.333 \times 0.333} = \frac{0.445}{0.111} = 4.01

(1 mark for equilibrium moles, 1 mark for expression, 1 mark for calculation.)

(b) Percentage conversion: 0.6671.00×100=66.7%\frac{0.667}{1.00} \times 100 = 66.7\% (1 mark).

(c) Halving the volume doubles all concentrations equally. Since Δn=0\Delta n = 0 (equal moles on both sides), the equilibrium position does not change (2 marks). The value of KcK_c remains the same ( only on temperature).

Q4 (4 marks)

Define the term solubility product, KspK_{sp}. The KspK_{sp} of PbI2\mathrm{PbI}_2 is 9.8×10−9 mol3 dm−99.8 \times 10^{-9}\,\mathrm{mol^3\,dm^{-9}} at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K}. Calculate the solubility of PbI2\mathrm{PbI}_2 in mol dm−3\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}}.

Mark Scheme:

Definition (1 mark): The solubility product is the product of the equilibrium concentrations of the ions in a saturated solution of a sparingly soluble ionic compound, each raised to the power of its stoichiometric coefficient.

Calculation (3 marks):

PbI2(s)⇌Pb2+(aq)+2I−(aq)\mathrm{PbI}_2(s) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Pb}^{2+}(aq) + 2\mathrm{I}^-(aq)

If ss is the solubility: [\mathrm{Pb}^{2+}] = s$$[\mathrm{I}^-] = 2s

Ksp=[Pb2+][I−]2=s×(2s)2=4s3K_{sp} = [\mathrm{Pb}^{2+}][\mathrm{I}^-]^2 = s \times (2s)^2 = 4s^3 s=Ksp43=9.8×10−943=2.45×10−93=1.35×10−3 mol dm−3s = \sqrt[3]{\frac{K_{sp}}{4}} = \sqrt[3]{\frac{9.8 \times 10^{-9}}{4}} = \sqrt[3]{2.45 \times 10^{-9}} = 1.35 \times 10^{-3}\,\mathrm{mol\,dm^{-3}}

(1 mark for expression, 1 mark for substitution, 1 mark for calculation.)