Thermodynamics and Energetics — Diagnostic Tests

Unit Tests

UT-1: Born-Haber Cycle for an Ionic Compound

Question:

Construct a Born-Haber cycle for magnesium oxide ($\text{MgO}$) and calculate the lattice energy. Use the following data:

Quantity	Value / $\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$
Enthalpy of atomisation of Mg	$+148$
Enthalpy of atomisation of O ($\frac{1}{2}\text{O}_2$)	$+249$
First ionisation energy of Mg	$+738$
Second ionisation energy of Mg	$+1451$
First electron affinity of O	$-141$
Second electron affinity of O	$+798$
Standard enthalpy of formation of MgO	$-602$

Solution:

Born-Haber cycle (all values in $\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$):

$\text{Mg}(s) + \tfrac{1}{2}\text{O}_2(g) \xrightarrow{\Delta H_f = -602} \text{Mg}^{2+}\text{O}^{2-}(s)$

Two routes from elements to ionic solid:

Route 1 (direct): $\Delta H_f = -602$

Route 2 (indirect via gaseous ions):

1. Atomisation of Mg: $+148$
2. Atomisation of $\frac{1}{2}\text{O}_2$: $+249$
3. First ionisation of Mg: $+738$
4. Second ionisation of Mg: $+1451$
5. First electron affinity of O: $-141$
6. Second electron affinity of O: $+798$
7. Lattice energy (LE): $\Delta H_{\text{latt}}$

By Hess’s law: Route 1 = Route 2

$-602 = 148 + 249 + 738 + 1451 - 141 + 798 + \Delta H_{\text{latt}}$

$-602 = 3243 + \Delta H_{\text{latt}}$

$\Delta H_{\text{latt}} = -602 - 3243 = -3845\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$

The lattice energy of MgO is $-3845\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$.

Note: The large magnitude reflects the very strong electrostatic attraction between $\text{Mg}^{2+}$ and $\text{O}^{2-}$ (high charges, small ions). The second electron affinity of oxygen is endothermic because adding an electron to a negatively charged $\text{O}^-$ ion requires energy to overcome repulsion.

---

UT-2: Hess’s Law with Indirect Enthalpy Determination

Question:

The standard enthalpy change of combustion of ethanol is $-1367\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$. The standard enthalpy change of combustion of carbon is $-394\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$And the standard enthalpy change of combustion of hydrogen is $-286\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$.

(a) Use Hess’s law to calculate the standard enthalpy change of formation of ethanol, $\text{C}_2\text{H}_5\text{OH}(l)$.

(b) The experimental value is $-277\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$. Suggest a reason why the calculated value might differ from the experimental value.

Solution:

(a) Target equation: $2\text{C}(s) + 3\text{H}_2(g) + \tfrac{1}{2}\text{O}_2(g) \to \text{C}_2\text{H}_5\text{OH}(l)$

Using the combustion data and Hess’s law (elements to products via combustion products):

Formation = Sum of combustion of elements - Combustion of compound

$\Delta H_f(\text{C}_2\text{H}_5\text{OH}) = 2 \times \Delta H_c(\text{C}) + 3 \times \Delta H_c(\text{H}_2) - \Delta H_c(\text{C}_2\text{H}_5\text{OH})$

$= 2 \times (-394) + 3 \times (-286) - (-1367)$

$= -788 - 858 + 1367$

$= -1646 + 1367 = -279\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$

(b) The calculated value ($-279\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$) is close to but not identical to the experimental value ($-277\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$). Small differences arise from:

• Experimental uncertainties in the combustion data used (each measurement has some error, which propagates through the calculation).
• Incomplete combustion in the experiments determining combustion enthalpies.
• State differences: The standard state of ethanol at $298\,\text{K}$ may not be exactly matched in the combustion experiment (e.g., trace water vapour vs liquid).
• Heat losses from the calorimeter during combustion measurements.

---

UT-3: Gibbs Free Energy and Spontaneity

Question:

For the decomposition of calcium carbonate:

$\text{CaCO}_3(s) \to \text{CaO}(s) + \text{CO}_2(g)$

$\Delta H^\circ = +178\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$, $\Delta S^\circ = +161\,\text{J K}^{-1}\text{ mol}^{-1}$.

(a) Calculate $\Delta G^\circ$ at $298\,\text{K}$ and state whether the reaction is spontaneous at this temperature.

(b) Calculate the minimum temperature at which the reaction becomes thermodynamically feasible.

(c) Explain why the entropy change is positive for this reaction, even though a solid is being converted to another solid and a gas.

Solution:

(a)

$\Delta G^\circ = \Delta H^\circ - T\Delta S^\circ$

$\Delta G^\circ = 178000 - 298 \times 161 = 178000 - 47978 = +130022\,\text{J mol}^{-1} = +130\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$

$\Delta G^\circ \gt 0$So the reaction is not spontaneous at $298\,\text{K}$.

(b) The reaction becomes feasible when $\Delta G^\circ \leq 0$:

$\Delta H^\circ - T\Delta S^\circ \leq 0$

$T \geq \frac◆LB◆\Delta H^\circ◆RB◆◆LB◆\Delta S^\circ◆RB◆ = \frac{178000}{161} = 1106\,\text{K}$

The minimum temperature is approximately $1106\,\text{K}$ ($833\,^\circ\text{C}$).

(c) The entropy change is positive because a gas is produced from a solid. Gases have much higher entropy than solids (gas molecules have many more possible arrangements due to their freedom of movement). The gain in entropy from creating 1 mol of $\text{CO}_2(g)$ more than compensates for the fact that one solid ($\text{CaCO}_3$) is replaced by another solid ($\text{CaO}$). The overall effect is an increase in disorder:

$\Delta S^\circ = S^\circ(\text{CaO}) + S^\circ(\text{CO}_2) - S^\circ(\text{CaCO}_3)$

The large positive entropy of $\text{CO}_2(g)$ (approximately $214\,\text{J K}^{-1}\text{ mol}^{-1}$) compared to the solids drives the overall entropy change positive.

Integration Tests

IT-1: Thermodynamic Feasibility of Industrial Processes (with Equilibrium)

Question:

The Contact process involves the oxidation of sulfur dioxide:

$2\text{SO}_2(g) + \text{O}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\text{SO}_3(g)$

$\Delta H^\circ = -198\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$, $\Delta S^\circ = -190\,\text{J K}^{-1}\text{ mol}^{-1}$.

(a) Calculate the temperature above which the reaction is no longer thermodynamically feasible.

(b) Given that industrial conditions use $400$—$450\,^\circ\text{C}$Explain why this temperature range is chosen despite the thermodynamic considerations.

(c) Calculate $\Delta G^\circ$ at $700\,\text{K}$ and hence calculate $K_p$ at this temperature.

Solution:

(a) The reaction ceases to be feasible when $\Delta G^\circ \gt 0$:

$T \gt \frac◆LB◆\Delta H^\circ◆RB◆◆LB◆\Delta S^\circ◆RB◆ = \frac{-198000}{-190} = 1042\,\text{K}$

Above $1042\,\text{K}$ ($769\,^\circ\text{C}$), the reaction is no longer thermodynamically spontaneous. The negative $\Delta S^\circ$ (3 mol gas $\to$ 2 mol gas) means that at high temperatures, the $-T\Delta S^\circ$ term dominates and makes $\Delta G^\circ$ positive.

(b) At $400$—$450\,^\circ\text{C}$ ($673$—$723\,\text{K}$), the reaction is thermodynamically feasible ($\Delta G^\circ \lt 0$ since $T \lt 1042\,\text{K}$). Although lower temperatures give a more negative $\Delta G^\circ$ (higher equilibrium yield), the rate of reaction would be impractically slow. $400$—$450\,^\circ\text{C}$ represents a compromise between thermodynamic yield and kinetic rate. A vanadium(V) oxide catalyst is used to further increase the rate at these temperatures.

(c) At $700\,\text{K}$:

$\Delta G^\circ = -198000 - 700 \times (-190) = -198000 + 133000 = -65000\,\text{J mol}^{-1}$

Using $\Delta G^\circ = -RT\ln K_p$:

$-65000 = -8.31 \times 700 \times \ln K_p$

$\ln K_p = \frac{65000}{5817} = 11.17$

$K_p = e^{11.17} = 7.08 \times 10^4\,\text{atm}^{-1}$

---

IT-2: Entropy Changes in Dissolution (with Bonding and Acids/Bases)

Question:

(a) Explain why the dissolution of $\text{NaCl}$ in water has a small positive entropy change, while the dissolution of $\text{CaCO}_3$ in water is not thermodynamically feasible.

(b) The dissolution of ammonium nitrate in water is endothermic yet spontaneous. Use thermodynamic arguments to explain this.

(c) Calculate the entropy change when $2.00\,\text{mol}$ of ice melts at $0\,^\circ\text{C}$. The standard enthalpy of fusion of ice is $+6.01\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$.

Solution:

(a) For $\text{NaCl}$ dissolving: $\text{NaCl}(s) \to \text{Na}^+(aq) + \text{Cl}^-(aq)$

The entropy change involves competing factors:

• Positive contribution: The ordered ionic lattice breaks down, and ions become dispersed in solution (increased disorder)
• Negative contribution: Water molecules become more ordered around the hydrated ions (water molecules orient their partial charges towards the ions, restricting their freedom)

For $\text{NaCl}$The lattice breakdown slightly outweighs the ordering of water, giving a small positive $\Delta S$.

For $\text{CaCO}_3$: $\text{CaCO}_3(s) \to \text{Ca}^{2+}(aq) + \text{CO}_3^{2-}(aq)$

The doubly-charged ions cause much more ordering of water molecules around them (stronger ion-dipole interactions, more structured hydration shells). The negative contribution from water ordering outweighs the positive contribution from lattice breakdown, giving a negative $\Delta S$. Combined with the endothermic lattice breaking, $\Delta G$ is positive, making dissolution non-spontaneous.

(b) For $\text{NH}_4\text{NO}_3(s) \to \text{NH}_4^+(aq) + \text{NO}_3^-(aq)$:

The process is endothermic ($\Delta H \gt 0$), but the entropy change is strongly positive because:

• The ionic lattice breaks down completely
• Both ions are large and singly charged, so they cause relatively little ordering of water
• The ammonium ion can form hydrogen bonds but retains rotational freedom

The large positive $\Delta S$ makes $-T\Delta S$ more negative than $\Delta H$ is positive, giving $\Delta G \lt 0$ (spontaneous). This demonstrates that enthalpy alone does not determine spontaneity.

(c) At the melting point, $\Delta G = 0$So $\Delta S = \Delta H/T$:

$\Delta S = \frac{6010}{273} = 22.0\,\text{J K}^{-1}\text{ mol}^{-1}$

For $2.00\,\text{mol}$:

$\Delta S_{\text{total}} = 2.00 \times 22.0 = 44.0\,\text{J K}^{-1}$

The positive entropy change reflects the increased disorder as water molecules in the rigid ice lattice gain freedom of movement in liquid water.

---

IT-3: Enthalpy Changes and Bond Energies (with Kinetics)

Question:

The hydrogenation of ethene is:

$\text{C}_2\text{H}_4(g) + \text{H}_2(g) \to \text{C}_2\text{H}_6(g) \quad \Delta H = -137\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$

Bond enthalpies: C$=$C $= 612$C—C $= 348$C—H $= 412$H—H $= 436$ (all in $\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$).

(a) Use bond enthalpies to estimate $\Delta H$ for this reaction and explain why it differs from the given value.

(b) Draw an enthalpy profile diagram for this reaction, labelling the activation energy $E_a$ and the enthalpy change $\Delta H$.

(c) Explain why this reaction requires a catalyst despite being exothermic.

Solution:

(a) Bonds broken:

• 1 $\times$ C$=$C: $612$
• 4 $\times$ C—H (in $\text{C}_2\text{H}_4$): $4 \times 412 = 1648$
• 1 $\times$ H—H: $436$

Total bonds broken: $612 + 1648 + 436 = 2696\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$

Bonds formed:

• 1 $\times$ C—C: $348$
• 6 $\times$ C—H (in $\text{C}_2\text{H}_6$): $6 \times 412 = 2472$

Total bonds formed: $348 + 2472 = 2820\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$

$\Delta H = 2696 - 2820 = -124\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$

This differs from the experimental value of $-137\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$ because bond enthalpies are average values taken from many different molecules. The actual C$=$C bond in ethene and C—C bond in ethane may differ from the average values. Bond enthalpies apply to gaseous species only and do not account for variations in bond strength due to the molecular environment.

(b) The enthalpy profile shows:

• Reactants ($\text{C}_2\text{H}_4 + \text{H}_2$) at a higher energy level
• Products ($\text{C}_2\text{H}_6$) at a lower energy level (exothermic, $\Delta H = -137\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$)
• A peak (transition state) above the reactants, with $E_a$ being the difference between the peak and the reactant energy level
• $\Delta H$ is the vertical difference between products and reactants

(c) Despite being exothermic ($\Delta H \lt 0$), the reaction has a significant activation energy ($E_a$). The H—H bond ($436\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$) and the C$=$C $\pi$-bond (part of the $612\,\text{kJ mol}^{-1}$) must be broken before new bonds can form. At room temperature, very few molecules have sufficient kinetic energy ($\geq E_a$) to overcome this barrier. A metal catalyst (e.g., Ni, Pd, or Pt) provides an alternative pathway by adsorbing both $\text{H}_2$ and $\text{C}_2\text{H}_4$ onto its surface, weakening the H—H bond and lowering the activation energy.

---

Additional Practice Problems

UT-4: Hess’s Law with Combustion Data

Question: Use the following standard enthalpies of combustion to calculate the standard enthalpy change for the hydrogenation of propene to propane:

$\mathrm{C}_3\mathrm{H}_6(g) + \mathrm{H}_2(g) \to \mathrm{C}_3\mathrm{H}_8(g)$

$\Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{C}_3\mathrm{H}_6) = -2058\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}$

$\Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{C}_3\mathrm{H}_8) = -2220\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}$

$\Delta H_c^\circ(\mathrm{H}_2) = -286\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}$

Solution:

Hess’s Law cycle:

Reactants $\to$ Products $\to$ Combustion products ($\mathrm{CO}_2 + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}$)

Path 1 (indirect): Reactants $\to$ combustion products: $\Delta H_c(\mathrm{C}_3\mathrm{H}_6) + \Delta H_c(\mathrm{H}_2) = -2058 + (-286) = -2344\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}$

Path 2 (via products): Products $\to$ combustion products: $\Delta H_c(\mathrm{C}_3\mathrm{H}_8) = -2220\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}$

$\Delta H^\circ = \text{Path 1} - \text{Path 2} = -2344 - (-2220) = -124\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}$ (2 marks).

The hydrogenation is exothermic, as expected for converting a C=C double bond to two C—H single bonds.

IT-4: Born-Haber and Entropy Combined

Question: Calculate the lattice energy of $\mathrm{CaF}_2$ using a Born-Haber cycle and the following data:

Quantity	Value (kJ mol$^{-1}$)
$\Delta H_f^\circ(\mathrm{CaF}_2)$	$-1220$
$\Delta H_{\text{atom}}(\mathrm{Ca})$	$+178$
$\Delta H_{\text{atom}}(\mathrm{F}_2)$ (per $\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{F}_2$)	$+79$
First IE of Ca	$+590$
Second IE of Ca	$+1145$
Electron affinity of F	$-328$

Solution:

Born-Haber cycle for $\mathrm{CaF}_2$:

$\Delta H_f^\circ = \Delta H_{\text{atom}}(\mathrm{Ca}) + \Delta H_{\text{atom}}(\mathrm{F}_2) \times 2 + \text{IE}_1 + \text{IE}_2 + \text{EA} \times 2 + \text{Lattice Energy}$

$-1220 = 178 + 79 \times 2 + 590 + 1145 + (-328) \times 2 + \text{LE}$

$-1220 = 178 + 158 + 590 + 1145 - 656 + \text{LE}$

$-1220 = 1415 + \text{LE}$

$\text{LE} = -1220 - 1415 = -2635\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}$ (2 marks).

The large (negative) lattice energy reflects the high charges on $\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}$ and $\mathrm{F}^-$ and the small ionic radii, both of which increase the electrostatic attraction in the

$$lattice (1 mark).$$